Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32760783›Full record

ArticleArchives animal breeding2020

Assessment of genetic diversity and differentiation among four indigenous Turkish sheep breeds using microsatellites.

Bahar Argun Karsli, Eymen Demir, Huseyin Goktug Fidan, Taki Karsli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives animal breeding, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessment of genome-wide genetic variability and population divergence of four native Turkish sheep breeds.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. An overview of remote monitoring methods in biodiversity conservation.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bahar Argun KarsliDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, 07058, Turkey.
Eymen DemirDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, 07058, Turkey.
Huseyin Goktug FidanDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, 07058, Turkey.
Taki KarsliDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, 07058, Turkey.
Akdeniz University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation and breeding programmes of livestock species depend on determination of genetic diversity. Today in livestock species, microsatellite markers are commonly used to reveal population structure and genetic diversity in both breeds and varieties. In this study, population structure, genetic diversity, and differentiation among four native Turkish sheep breeds including Güney Karaman, Kangal, Norduz, and Karakas were assessed by using 21 microsatellite loci. By genotyping 120 individuals belonging to four sheep breeds, a total of 275 different alleles, 37 of which were private alleles, were observed across all loci. The mean number of alleles per breed ranged from 7.28 (Güney Karaman) to 8.09 (Karakas), while allelic richness ranged from 7.22 (Güney Karaman) to 7.87 (Karakas). Mean observed heterozygosity varied from 0.60 (Kangal) to 0.66 (Norduz and Karakas). The lowest pairwise

Identifiers

PMID32760783
PMCPMC7397719
OpenAlexW3034971708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.