ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2020
A 2-Hour Diabetes Self-Management Education Program for Patients With Low Socioeconomic Status Improves Short-Term Glycemic Control.
Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sociodemographic and behavioral factors associated with diet quality in low-income adults with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes.Primary care diabetes · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes self-management education (DSME) improves glycemic control, but patients with low socioeconomic status face institutional and personal barriers to receiving DSME. A retrospective single cohort study of a 2-hour group DSME program prioritizing accessibility and completion of a tightly focused curriculum was performed to determine if glycemic control improved and whether a longer, more comprehensive, prospective evaluation of the program is indicated. All patients who participated in the program from September 2017 to December 2018 were included in the analysis. The primary study endpoint was change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline. A total of 58 out of 94 patients (61.7%) had paired measurements of HbA1c. Mean HbA1c improved from 9.8% ± 2.2% (83.5 ± 24.2 mmol/mol) to 8.3% ± 2.0% (67.7 ± 22.0 mmol/mol) at a median of 4 months after participation in the program (P<0.001). The proportion of patients with any improvement in HbA1c was 75.9% (44 of 58; P=0.003), and 65.5% of patients (38 of 58; P=0.066) had an improvement in HbA1c of ≥0.5%. These results demonstrate the benefit of highly targeted DSME for low-income patients and justify a longer-term and prospective evaluation of the program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.