Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32760676›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2020

Modern Tools for Rapid Diagnostics of Antimicrobial Resistance.

Antti Vasala, Vesa P Hytönen, Olli H Laitinen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
21.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 321 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Reducing time-to-result in bloodstream infections: comparative evaluation of VITEK® REVEAL™ and QuickMIC® for rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Machine Learning for CRISPR-Based Diagnostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Membrane-Focused Strategies AgainstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antti VasalaProtein Dynamics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Vesa P HytönenProtein Dynamics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Olli H LaitinenProtein Dynamics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Tampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fast, robust, and affordable antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is required, as roughly 50% of antibiotic treatments are started with wrong antibiotics and without a proper diagnosis of the pathogen. Validated growth-based AST according to EUCAST or CLSI (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute) recommendations is currently suggested to guide the antimicrobial therapy. Any new AST should be validated against these standard methods. Many rapid diagnostic techniques can already provide pathogen identification. Some of them can additionally detect the presence of resistance genes or resistance proteins, but usually isolated pure cultures are needed for AST. We discuss the value of the technologies applying nucleic acid amplification, whole genome sequencing, and hybridization as well as immunodiagnostic and mass spectrometry-based methods and biosensor-based AST. Additionally, we evaluate the potential of integrated systems applying microfluidics to integrate cultivation, lysis, purification, and signal reading steps. We discuss technologies and commercial products with potential for Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) and their capability to analyze polymicrobial samples without pre-purification steps. The purpose of this critical review is to present the needs and drivers for AST development, to show the benefits and limitations of AST methods, to introduce promising new POCT-compatible technologies, and to discuss AST technologies that are likely to thrive in the future.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agentsantibiotic resistanceantimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial susceptibility testpoint of care testrapid AST

Identifiers

PMID32760676
PMCPMC7373752
OpenAlexW3043625533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.