Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32760572›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Assessing biotic and abiotic effects on forest productivity in three temperate forests.

Qingmin Yue, Minhui Hao, Xiaoyu Li, Chunyu Zhang, Klaus von Gadow, Xiuhai Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qingmin YueResearch Center of Forest Management Engineering of State Forestry and Grassland Administration Beijing Forestry University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6401-598X
Minhui HaoResearch Center of Forest Management Engineering of State Forestry and Grassland Administration Beijing Forestry University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6345-4937
Xiaoyu LiResearch Center of Forest Management Engineering of State Forestry and Grassland Administration Beijing Forestry University Beijing China.
Chunyu ZhangResearch Center of Forest Management Engineering of State Forestry and Grassland Administration Beijing Forestry University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3091-5060
Klaus von GadowFaculty of Forestry and Forest Ecology Georg-August-University Göttingen Germany.
Xiuhai ZhaoResearch Center of Forest Management Engineering of State Forestry and Grassland Administration Beijing Forestry University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0879-4063

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well understood that biotic and abiotic variables influence forest productivity. However, in regard to temperate forests, the relative contributions of the aforementioned drivers to biomass demographic processes (i.e., the growth rates of the survivors and recruits) have not received a great deal of attention. Thus, this study focused on the identification of the relative influencing effects of biotic and abiotic variables in the demographic biomass processes of temperate forests.This study was conducted in the Changbai Mountain Nature Reserve, in northeastern China. Based on the observational data collected from three 5.2-hectare forest plots, the annual above-ground biomass (AGB) increment (productivity) of the surviving trees, recruits, and the total tree community (survivors + recruits) were estimated. Then, the changes in the forest productivity in response to biotic variables (including species diversity, structural diversity, and density variables) along with abiotic variables (including topographic and soil variables) were evaluated using linear mixed-effect models.This study determined that the biotic variables regulated the variabilities in productivity. Density variables were the most critical drivers of the annual AGB increments of the surviving trees and total tree community. Structural diversity enhanced the annual AGB increments of the recruits, but diminished the annual AGB increments of the surviving trees and the total tree community. Species diversity and abiotic variables did not have impacts on the productivity in the examined forest plots.The results highlighted the important roles of forest density and structural diversity in the biomass demographic processes of temperate forests. The surviving and recruit trees were found to respond differently to the biotic variables, which suggested that the asymmetric competition had shaped the productivity dynamics in forests. Therefore, the findings emphasized the need to consider the demographic processes of forest productivity to better understand the functions of forests.

Indexed as

biodiversity and productivity relationshipsbiotic effectsforest productivityspecies diversitystand densitystructural diversity

Identifiers

PMID32760572
PMCPMC7391343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.