Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32760544›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

The protected flora of long-established cemeteries in Hungary: Using historical maps in biodiversity conservation.

Viktor Löki, András Schmotzer, Attila Takács, Kristóf Süveges, Ádám Lovas-Kiss, Balázs András Lukács, Jácint Tökölyi, Attila Molnár V

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Assessing the conservation value of cemeteries to urban biota worldwide.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Orchids of Azerbaijani Cemeteries.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Viktor LökiWetland Ecology Research Group Centre for Ecological Research, DRI Debrecen Hungary.
András SchmotzerBükk National Park Wildlife Department Eger Hungary.
Attila TakácsDepartment of Botany University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary.
Kristóf SüvegesDepartment of Botany University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary.
Ádám Lovas-KissWetland Ecology Research Group Centre for Ecological Research, DRI Debrecen Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8811-1623
Balázs András LukácsWetland Ecology Research Group Centre for Ecological Research, DRI Debrecen Hungary.
Jácint TökölyiMTA-DE Behavioural Ecology Research Group University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary.
Attila Molnár VDepartment of Botany University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7096-9579

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of anthropogenically influenced habitats in conserving elements of the original wildlife has increased worldwide simultaneously with the disappearance of natural sites. Burial places are able to conserve original elements of the wildlife, and this fact has been known for at least a century. To this day, little is known about long-time changes and the effect of long-time management methods in cemeteries on the flora they harbor. The utility of historical maps in research focused on natural values, as well as in answering questions related to conservation was recently demonstrated, but the use of digitized historical maps in biodiversity research of the Carpathian Basin is very limited. In the present paper, we aimed to predict the conservation potential of long-established and newly established cemeteries of Hungarian settlements with various population sizes based on the digitized maps of the 2nd Military Survey of the Austrian Empire (1819-1869), by categorizing cemeteries into 3 distinct (anthropogenic habitat, cemetery, or natural habitat) types. To build our models, we used records of the protected flora from Hungarian cemeteries, based on data of thematic botanical surveys of 991 cemeteries. Out of the surveyed cemeteries, 553 (56%) harbored protected plants, totaling 306.617 estimated individuals of 92 protected species, belonging to 28 plant families. These species represent 12% of the entire protected flora of Hungary. Hungarian cemeteries play a key role mainly in preserving steppe and dry grassland plant species. Long-established and large cemeteries harbor more protected plant species than small and newly established ones. Human population size of the settlements correlated negatively with the number of protected species and individuals. Moreover, woodland cover and proportion of grassland also significantly positively affected the number of protected plant species in cemeteries.

Indexed as

man‐made habitatsnature conservationred list speciesrefugessecondary habitatsvascular plants

Identifiers

PMID32760544
PMCPMC7391536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.