Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32760439›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2020

Distribution of hygiene kits during a cholera outbreak in Kasaï-Oriental, Democratic Republic of Congo: a process evaluation.

Lauren D'Mello-Guyett, Katie Greenland, Sharla Bonneville, Rob D'hondt, Maria Mashako, Alexandre Gorski, Dorien Verheyen, Rafael Van den Bergh, Peter Maes, Francesco Checchi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A call for strengthened evidence on targeted, non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 for the protection of vulnerable individuals in sub-Saharan Africa.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lauren D'Mello-GuyettFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8174-1737
Katie GreenlandFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Sharla BonnevilleMédecins Sans Frontières, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Rob D'hondtEnvironmental Health Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium.
Maria MashakoMédecins Sans Frontières, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Alexandre GorskiMédecins Sans Frontières, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Dorien VerheyenMédecins Sans Frontières, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Rafael Van den BerghLuxOR, Luxembourg Operational Research Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.
Peter MaesEnvironmental Health Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium.
Francesco ChecchiFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Oliver CummingFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMédecins Sans Frontières · BEMédecins Sans Frontières · LU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholera remains a leading cause of infectious disease outbreaks globally, and a major public health threat in complex emergencies. Hygiene kits distributed to cholera case-households have previously shown an effect in reducing cholera incidence and are recommended by Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) for distribution to admitted patients and accompanying household members upon admission to health care facilities (HCFs).

methodsThis process evaluation documented the implementation, participant response and context of hygiene kit distribution by MSF during a 2018 cholera outbreak in Kasaï-Oriental, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The study population comprised key informant interviews with seven MSF staff, 17 staff from other organisations and a random sample of 27 hygiene kit recipients. Structured observations were conducted of hygiene kit demonstrations and health promotion, and programme reports were analysed to triangulate data. RESULTS AND

conclusionsBetween Week (W) 28-48 of the 2018 cholera outbreak in Kasaï-Oriental, there were 667 suspected cholera cases with a 5% case fatality rate (CFR). Across seven HCFs supported by MSF, 196 patients were admitted with suspected cholera between W43-W47 and hygiene kit were provided to patients upon admission and health promotion at the HCF was conducted to accompanying household contacts 5-6 times per day. Distribution of hygiene kits was limited and only 52% of admitted suspected cholera cases received a hygiene kit. The delay of the overall response, delayed supply and insufficient quantities of hygiene kits available limited the coverage and utility of the hygiene kits, and may have diminished the effectiveness of the intervention. The integration of a WASH intervention for cholera control at the point of patient admission is a growing trend and promising intervention for case-targeted cholera responses. However, the barriers identified in this study warrant consideration in subsequent cholera responses and further research is required to identify ways to improve implementation and delivery of this intervention.

Indexed as

CholeraEmergencyHygieneOutbreaksProcess evaluationSanitationWater

Identifiers

PMID32760439
PMCPMC7379792
OpenAlexW3044625174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.