ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020
The Development of Context-Sensitive Attention Across Cultures: The Impact of Stimulus Familiarity.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reframing neuroergonomics in an evolutionary and active inference context.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2026Article
- Understanding speech in "noise" or free energy minimization in the soundscapes of the anthropocene.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Are Deaf College Students More Sensitive to Unfair Information? Evidence from an ERP Study.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Investigating attention toward pain-related cues in an Arabic-speaking population with and without chronic pain.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- The Development of Context-Sensitive Attention in Urban and Rural Brazil.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Cross-Cultural Differences in the Generation of Novel Ideas in Middle Childhood.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Cultural Differences in Visual Attention Emerge in Infancy.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant StudiesArticle
- Holistic and Analytic Attention in Infancy: A Cross-Cultural Study in Sweden and Zimbabwe.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant StudiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Across cultures, there are marked differences in visual attention that gradually develop between 4 and 6 years of age. According to the social orientation hypothesis, people in interdependent cultures should show more pronounced context sensitivity than people in independent cultures. However, according to the differential familiarity hypothesis, the focus on the salient object should also depend on the familiarity of the stimulus; people will focus more on the focal object (i.e., less context sensitivity), if it is a less familiar stimulus. To examine the differences in visual attention between interdependent and independent cultures while taking into account stimulus familiarity, this study used an eye-tracking paradigm to assess visual attention of participants between 4 and 20 years who came from urban middle-class families from Germany (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.