Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32760318›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

Food Reputation and Food Preferences: Application of the Food Reputation Map (FRM) in Italy, USA, and China.

Stefano De Dominicis, Flavia Bonaiuto, Ferdinando Fornara, Uberta Ganucci Cancellieri, Irene Petruccelli, William D Crano, Jianhong Ma, Marino Bonaiuto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefano De DominicisDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Flavia BonaiutoDipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Ferdinando FornaraDipartimento di Pedagogia, Psicologia, Filosofia, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Uberta Ganucci CancellieriUniversità per Stranieri "Dante Alighieri" di Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Irene PetruccelliFacoltà di Economia, Universitas Mercatorum, Rome, Italy.
William D CranoDepartment of Psychology, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, United States.
Jianhong MaSchool of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Marino BonaiutoCIRPA-Centro Interuniversitario di Ricerca in Psicologia Ambientale, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the food challenges that society is facing, we draw upon recent developments in the study of how food reputation affects food preferences and food choices, providing here a starting standard point for measuring every aspect of food reputation in different cultural contexts across the world. Specifically, while previous attempts focused either on specific aspects of food or on measures of food features validated in one language only, the present research validates the Food Reputation Map (FRM) in Italian, English and Chinese over 2,250 participants worldwide. Here we successfully measure food reputation across 23 specific indicators, further grouped into six synthetic indicators of food reputation. Critically, results show that: (a) the specific measurement tool of food reputation can vary across cultural contexts, and that (b) people's reputation of food products or categories changes significantly across different cultural contexts. Therefore, in order to understand people's food preferences and consumption, it is important to take into account the repertoire of cultural differences that underlies the contexts of analysis: the three context-specific versions of the FRM presented here effectively deal with this issue and provide reliable context-specific insights on stakeholders' interests, perspectives, attitudes and behaviors related to food perceptions, assessment, and consumption, which can be effectively leveraged to foster food sustainability.

Indexed as

consumer behaviorcultural differencesfood behaviorfood choicesfood preferencesfood reputation mapmeasurereputation

Identifiers

PMID32760318
PMCPMC7372101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.