ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020
Functional Validation of
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole-exome sequencing in children with dyslexia implicates rare variants in CLDN3 and ion channel genes.Human genetics · 2025Article
- An affinity-modulated T cell engager targeting Claudin 18.2 shows potent anti-tumor activity with limited cytokine release.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- SAIL66, a next generation CLDN6-targeting T-cell engager, demonstrates potent antitumor efficacy through dual binding to CD3/CD137.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024Article
- Canonical and Non-Canonical Localization of Tight Junction Proteins during Early Murine Cranial Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Gene-nutrient interactions that impact magnesium homeostasis increase risk for neural tube defects in mice exposed to dolutegravir.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Organoids as a new model system to study neural tube defects.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neural tube defects (NTDs) are severe malformations of the central nervous system that affect 1-2 individuals per 2,000 births. Their etiology is complex and involves both genetic and environmental factors. Our recent discovery that simultaneous removal of Cldn3, -4, and -8 from tight junctions results in cranial and spinal NTDs in both chick and mouse embryos suggests that claudins play a conserved role in neural tube closure in vertebrates. To determine if claudins were associated with NTDs in humans, we used a Fluidigm next generation sequencing approach to identify genetic variants in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.