Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32760156›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Recycling of spent mushroom substrate: Utilization as feed material for the larvae of the yellow mealworm Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae).

Tian-Hao Li, Peng-Fei Che, Chao-Ran Zhang, Bo Zhang, Asad Ali, Lian-Sheng Zang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects ofFrontiers in insect science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploiting Agri-Food Waste as Feed forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Revalorization of degraded maguey pulquero substrate forCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Future Proteins: Sustainable Diets forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tian-Hao LiJilin Engineering Research Center of Resource Insects Industrialization, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Peng-Fei CheJilin Engineering Research Center of Resource Insects Industrialization, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Chao-Ran ZhangJilin Engineering Research Center of Resource Insects Industrialization, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Bo ZhangEngineering Research Center of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Asad AliDepartment of Agriculture, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan.
Lian-Sheng ZangJilin Engineering Research Center of Resource Insects Industrialization, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9964-0512
Jilin Agricultural University · CNAbdul Wali Khan University Mardan · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spent mushroom substrate is made from the waste remaining after the harvest of mushrooms. Here, we evaluated the potential of five spent edible fungi (Auricularia cornea, Lentinus edodes, Pleurotus eryngii, P. citrinopileatus and P. ostreatus) substrates as feed sources for Tenebrio molitor larvae. Young larvae did not survive on any substrate except the spent L. edodes substrate (36.7%). The survival rates in young larvae were similar among the different diets in which wheat bran or rice bran was replaced with 0, 20, 30, 40, 50, or 60% spent L. edodes substrate. The weights of the surviving larvae were decreased only when 70% of wheat bran and > 40% of rice bran was replaced with spent L. edodes substrate. In addition, the middle-aged larvae fed wheat bran only were significantly larger than those fed diets with 30~60% spent L. edodes substrate in dry feed, but the larvae of all treatments failed to pupate. Whereas the green feed was added in dry feed, there were no significant differences in pupal weight, pupation rate, pupal duration, adult emergence, or deformed adults among the three treatments in middle-aged larvae that were fed on diets containing 0, 30, or 40% spent L. edodes substrate. Collectively, these results suggest that spent L. edodes substrate has considerable potential to be used as a partial replacement (< 40%) of conventional feed for T. molitor, and spent mushroom substrate waste may be recycled as feed material for resource insects.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAgaricalesAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsLarvaTenebrio

Identifiers

PMID32760156
PMCPMC7410198
OpenAlexW3048259639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.