Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32759978›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2021

Comparison of three PD-L1 immunohistochemical assays in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Emma J de Ruiter, Frans J Mulder, Bregje M Koomen, Ernst-Jan Speel, Mari F C M van den Hout, Reinout H de Roest, Elisabeth Bloemena, Lot A Devriese, Stefan M Willems

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Emma J de RuiterDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. e.j.deruiter@umcutrecht.nl.
Frans J MulderDepartment of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bregje M KoomenDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3106-5734
Ernst-Jan SpeelDepartment of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Mari F C M van den HoutDepartment of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Reinout H de RoestDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth BloemenaDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0221-9538
Lot A DevrieseDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stefan M WillemsDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Heidelberg University · DEMaastricht University · NLAcademic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding (Dutch Cancer Society) A6C 7072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is being used as predictive biomarker for immunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Several antibodies are available for PD-L1 testing and multiple staining and scoring methods are used. This study aimed to compare the performance of two PD-L1 standardized assays (SP263 and 22C3 pharmDx) and one laboratory-developed test (LDT) (22C3) in HNSCC using the tumor proportion score (TPS) and the combined positive score (CPS). Pretreatment biopsies from 147 HNSCC patients were collected in a tissue-microarray (TMA). Serial sections of the TMA were immunohistochemically stained for PD-L1 expression using 22C3 pharmDx on the Dako Link 48 platform, SP263 on the Ventana Benchmark Ultra platform, and 22C3 as an LDT on the Ventana Benchmark Ultra. Stained slides were assessed for TPS and CPS. Cutoffs of ≥1% and ≥50% for TPS and ≥1 and ≥20 for CPS were used. Concordance between the different staining assays was moderate to poor for TPS (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.46) as well as for CPS (ICC 0.34). When stratifying patients by clinically relevant cutoffs, considerable differences between the assays were observed: concordance was poor for both TPS and CPS. Generally, SP263 stained a higher percentage of cells than the other assays, especially when using the CPS. Moderate concordance was shown between three different PD-L1 immunohistochemical assays and considerable differences in PD-L1 positivity were observed when using clinically relevant cutoffs. This should be taken into account when using PD-L1 expression to guide clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdultAgedB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID32759978
OpenAlexW3047138337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.