Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32759974›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2020

Fungal communities decline with urbanization-more in air than in soil.

Nerea Abrego, Brittni Crosier, Panu Somervuo, Natalia Ivanova, Arusyak Abrahamyan, Amir Abdi, Karoliina Hämäläinen, Kaisa Junninen, Minna Maunula, Jenna Purhonen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identification and Multigene Phylogenetic Analysis RevealJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. New additions toMycoKeys · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Biomedicines · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nerea AbregoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland. nerea.abrego@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6347-6127
Brittni CrosierOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Panu SomervuoOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3121-4047
Natalia IvanovaCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Arusyak AbrahamyanCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Amir AbdiTrycksbackantie 20, 10360, Mustio, Finland.
Karoliina HämäläinenSchool of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101, Joensuu, Finland.
Kaisa JunninenSchool of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101, Joensuu, Finland.
Minna MaunulaDepartment of Microbiology, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 56, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Jenna PurhonenDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Otso OvaskainenOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9750-4421

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that degradation of biodiversity in human populated areas is a threat for the ecosystem processes that are relevant for human well-being. Fungi are a megadiverse kingdom that plays a key role in ecosystem processes and affects human well-being. How urbanization influences fungi has remained poorly understood, partially due to the methodological difficulties in comprehensively surveying fungi. Here we show that both aerial and soil fungal communities are greatly poorer in urban than in natural areas. Strikingly, a fivefold reduction in fungal DNA abundance took place in both air and soil samples already at 1 km scale when crossing the edge from natural to urban habitats. Furthermore, in the air, fungal diversity decreased with urbanization even more than in the soil. This result is counterintuitive as fungal spores are known to disperse over large distances. A large proportion of the fungi detectable in the air are specialized to natural habitats, whereas soil fungal communities comprise a large proportion of habitat generalists. The sensitivity of the aerial fungal community to anthropogenic disturbance makes this method a reliable and efficient bioindicator of ecosystem health in urban areas.

Indexed as

MycobiomeBiodiversityDNA, FungalEcosystemFungiHumansSoilSoil MicrobiologyUrbanizationDNA, FungalSoil

Identifiers

PMID32759974
PMCPMC7784924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.