ArticleNature communications2020
Alternative meta-analysis of behavioral interventions to promote action on climate change yields different conclusions.
Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Field interventions for climate change mitigation behaviors: A second-order meta-analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- No evidence that nonincentivized behavioral interventions effectively mitigate climate change after adjusting for publication bias.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Pricing instruments in environmental and climate policy when polluters are boundedly rational.npj climate action · 2025Article
- Combining mechanisms of action with behavior change techniques-theory-based development of an app promoting heating energy-saving behaviors.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Experimental evidence on the role of framing, difficulty and domain-similarity in shaping behavioral spillovers.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prioritising Climate Change Mitigation Behaviours and Exploring Public Health Co-Benefits: A Delphi Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- A Randomized Controlled Trial to Address Consumer Food Waste with a Technology-aided Tailored Sustainability Intervention.Resources, conservation, and recycling · 2022Article
- Linking environmental psychology and critical social psychology: Theoretical considerations toward a comprehensive research agenda.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- Climate policy support as a tool to control others' (but not own) environmental behavior?PloS one · 2022Article
- Reply to: Alternative meta-analysis of behavioural interventions to promote action on climate change yields different conclusions.Nature communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.