Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32759871›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Synthetic Bone Grafting in Aseptic Loosening of Acetabular Cup: Good Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Contained Bone Defects at Medium-Term Follow Up.

Paolo Domenico Parchi, Matteo Simonetti, Enrico Bonicoli, Nicola Piolanti, Michelangelo Scaglione

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paolo Domenico Parchi1st Orthopedic Division, Department of Translational Research and new technology in medicine and surgery, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Matteo Simonetti1st Orthopedic Division, Department of Translational Research and new technology in medicine and surgery, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3368-8919
Enrico Bonicoli1st Orthopedic Division, Department of Translational Research and new technology in medicine and surgery, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Nicola Piolanti1st Orthopedic Division, Department of Translational Research and new technology in medicine and surgery, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Michelangelo Scaglione1st Orthopedic Division, Department of Translational Research and new technology in medicine and surgery, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restoring bone loss is one of the major challenges when facing hip revision surgery. To eliminate the risk of disease transmission and antigenicity of allografts and donor-morbidity of autografts, the use of synthetic bioceramics has become popular in the last decade. Our study investigated the effectiveness of impaction bone grafting (IBG) of contained acetabular defects (Paprosky 2 and 3a) using a porous ceramic-based hydroxyapatite bone substitute (Engipore, provided by Finceramica Faenza S.p.A., Faenza, Italy) mixed with a low percentage of autologous bone (obtained from reaming when available). We retrospectively assessed 36 patients who underwent acetabular revision using IBG using a porous ceramic-based hydroxyapatite bone substitute with cementless implants with a mean follow-up of 4.4 years. We evaluated, at regular intervals, patients clinically (using the Hip Harris Score and Oxford Score) and radiologically to evaluate the rate of incorporation of the graft, the presence of radiolucent lines or migrations of the cup. Clinical scores significantly improved (WOMAC improved from 49.7-67.30, and the HSS from 56-89). The rate of implants' survival was 100% at our medium follow-up (4.4 years). We reported five cases of minor migration of the cup, and radiolucent lines were visible in seven patients at the last-follow up. The graft was well-incorporated in all patients. The results presented in this study suggest the HA bone substitute is an effective and safe bone graft when facing hip revision surgery; thus, longer follow-up studies are required.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipBone TransplantationHip ProsthesisFollow-Up StudiesHumansItalyProsthesis FailureReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeacetabular cupbone graftingbone substituteshydroxyapatiteosteointegrationtotal hip arthroplasty revision

Identifiers

PMID32759871
PMCPMC7432051
OpenAlexW3047033899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.