ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Ultrasound Assessment of Hepatic Steatosis by Using the Double Nakagami Distribution: A Feasibility Study.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative ultrasound moment-based double Nakagami distribution method.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Feasibility of Backscattering Coefficient Evaluation of Soft Tissue Using High-Frequency Annular Array Probe.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Relationship between transmission/reception conditions of high-frequency plane wave compounding and evaluation accuracy of extended amplitude envelope statistics.Japanese journal of applied physics (2008) · 2024Article
- Generalized formulations producing a Burr distribution of speckle statistics.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2022Article
- Ultrasound Sample Entropy Imaging: A New Approach for Evaluating Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound imaging is a first-line assessment tool for hepatic steatosis. Properties of tissue microstructures correlate with the statistical distribution of ultrasound backscattered signals, which can be described by the Nakagami distribution (a widely adopted approximation of backscattered statistics). The double Nakagami distribution (DND) model, which combines two Nakagami distributions, was recently proposed for using high-frequency ultrasound to analyze backscattered statistics corresponding to lipid droplets in the fat-infiltrated liver. This study evaluated the clinical feasibility of the DND model in ultrasound parametric imaging of hepatic steatosis by conducting clinical experiments using low-frequency ultrasound dedicated to general abdominal examinations. A total of 204 patients were recruited, and ultrasound image raw data were acquired using a 3.5 MHz array transducer for DND parametric imaging using the sliding window technique. The DND parameters were compared with hepatic steatosis grades identified histologically. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance. The results indicated that DND parametric imaging constructed using a sliding window with the side length of five times the pulse length of the transducer provided stable and reliable DND parameter estimations and visualized changes in the backscattered statistics caused by hepatic steatosis. The DND parameter increased with the hepatic steatosis grade. The areas under the ROC curve for identifying hepatic steatosis were 0.76 (≥mild), 0.81 (≥moderate), and 0.82 (≥severe). When using low-frequency ultrasound, DND imaging allows the clinical detection of hepatic steatosis and reflects information associated with lipid droplets in the fat-infiltrated liver.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.