Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32759818›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Use of Whole Genome Sequencing Data for a First in Silico Specificity Evaluation of the RT-qPCR Assays Used for SARS-CoV-2 Detection.

Mathieu Gand, Kevin Vanneste, Isabelle Thomas, Steven Van Gucht, Arnaud Capron, Philippe Herman, Nancy H C Roosens, Sigrid C J De Keersmaecker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Improved protocol forExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  2. Progress of the "Molecular Informatics" Section in 2022.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mathieu GandTransversal activities in Applied Genomics, Sciensano, J. Wytsmanstraat 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Kevin VannesteTransversal activities in Applied Genomics, Sciensano, J. Wytsmanstraat 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Isabelle ThomasViral Diseases, Sciensano, J. Wytsmanstraat 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Steven Van GuchtViral Diseases, Sciensano, J. Wytsmanstraat 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Arnaud CapronQuality of Laboratories, Sciensano, J. Wytsmanstraat 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Philippe HermanExpertise and Service Provision, Sciensano, J. Wytsmanstraat 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Nancy H C RoosensTransversal activities in Applied Genomics, Sciensano, J. Wytsmanstraat 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9218-078X
Sigrid C J De KeersmaeckerTransversal activities in Applied Genomics, Sciensano, J. Wytsmanstraat 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4198-4133
Sciensano (Belgium) · BE

Funding

Sciensano COVID-19 special funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic started in December 2019. COVID-19 cases are confirmed by the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in biological samples by RT-qPCR. However, limited numbers of SARS-CoV-2 genomes were available when the first RT-qPCR methods were developed in January 2020 for initial in silico specificity evaluation and to verify whether the targeted loci are highly conserved. Now that more whole genome data have become available, we used the bioinformatics tool SCREENED and a total of 4755 publicly available SARS-CoV-2 genomes, downloaded at two different time points, to evaluate the specificity of 12 RT-qPCR tests (consisting of a total of 30 primers and probe sets) used for SARS-CoV-2 detection and the impact of the virus' genetic evolution on four of them. The exclusivity of these methods was also assessed using the human reference genome and 2624 closely related other respiratory viral genomes. The specificity of the assays was generally good and stable over time. An exception is the first method developed by the China Center for Disease Control and prevention (CDC), which exhibits three primer mismatches present in 358 SARS-CoV-2 genomes sequenced mainly in Europe from February 2020 onwards. The best results were obtained for the assay of Chan et al. (2020) targeting the gene coding for the spiking protein (S). This demonstrates that our user-friendly strategy can be used for a first in silico specificity evaluation of future RT-qPCR tests, as well as verifying that the former methods are still capable of detecting circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Databases, GeneticHumansOpen Reading FramesPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityWhole Genome SequencingRNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseRNA, Viralbioinformatics toolCOVID-19detectiondiagnosisin silico specificity evaluationmismatchesprimers and probesRT-qPCRSARS-CoV-2WGS data

Identifiers

PMID32759818
PMCPMC7432934
OpenAlexW3046894265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.