Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32759676›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2020

Co-Chaperones in Targeting and Delivery of Misfolded Proteins to the 26S Proteasome.

Amanda B Abildgaard, Sarah K Gersing, Sven Larsen-Ledet, Sofie V Nielsen, Amelie Stein, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Rasmus Hartmann-Petersen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. VCP controls KCC2 degradation through FAF1 recruitment and accelerates emergence from anesthesia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. HSP70-binding motifs function as protein quality control degrons.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Quality control of cytoplasmic proteins inside the nucleus.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda B AbildgaardDepartment of Biology, The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sarah K GersingDepartment of Biology, The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sven Larsen-LedetDepartment of Biology, The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sofie V NielsenDepartment of Biology, Section for Computational and RNA Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Amelie SteinDepartment of Biology, Section for Computational and RNA Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5862-1681
Kresten Lindorff-LarsenDepartment of Biology, The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4750-6039
Rasmus Hartmann-PetersenDepartment of Biology, The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4155-7791
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Lundbeckfonden R272-2017-452Natur og Univers, Det Frie Forskningsråd 7014-00039B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein homeostasis (proteostasis) is essential for the cell and is maintained by a highly conserved protein quality control (PQC) system, which triages newly synthesized, mislocalized and misfolded proteins. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), molecular chaperones, and co-chaperones are vital PQC elements that work together to facilitate degradation of misfolded and toxic protein species through the 26S proteasome. However, the underlying mechanisms are complex and remain partly unclear. Here, we provide an overview of the current knowledge on the co-chaperones that directly take part in targeting and delivery of PQC substrates for degradation. While J-domain proteins (JDPs) target substrates for the heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) chaperones, nucleotide-exchange factors (NEFs) deliver HSP70-bound substrates to the proteasome. So far, three NEFs have been established in proteasomal delivery: HSP110 and the ubiquitin-like (UBL) domain proteins BAG-1 and BAG-6, the latter acting as a chaperone itself and carrying its substrates directly to the proteasome. A better understanding of the individual delivery pathways will improve our ability to regulate the triage, and thus regulate the fate of aberrant proteins involved in cell stress and disease, examples of which are given throughout the review.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingAnimalsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteostasisATP dependent 26S proteaseHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsProteasome Endopeptidase Complexchaperoneco-chaperonemisfoldingproteasomeprotein quality controlprotein stabilityubiquitin

Identifiers

PMID32759676
PMCPMC7463752
OpenAlexW3047571199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.