Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32759578›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2020

Clinical Features of Esophageal Eosinophilia According to Endoscopic Phenotypes.

Takashi Kon, Yasuhiko Abe, Yu Sasaki, Ryosuke Kikuchi, Shiho Uchiyama, Gen Kusaka, Takao Yaoita, Makoto Yagi, Masakuni Shoji, Yusuke Onozato and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takashi KonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Japan.
Yasuhiko AbeDivision of Endoscopy, Yamagata University Hospital, Japan.
Yu SasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Japan.
Ryosuke KikuchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, JR Sendai Hospital, Japan.
Shiho UchiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, JR Sendai Hospital, Japan.
Gen KusakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, JR Sendai Hospital, Japan.
Takao YaoitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Japan.
Makoto YagiDivision of Endoscopy, Yamagata University Hospital, Japan.
Masakuni ShojiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Japan.
Yusuke OnozatoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Japan.
Naoko MizumotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Japan.
Yoshiyuki UenoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Japan.
Yamagata University · JPSendai Shakai Hoken Hospital · JPYamagata University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Esophageal eosinophilia (EE), a histological hallmark of eosinophilic esophagitis, is classified into two endoscopic phenotypes: localized and diffuse EE. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of EE localized in the lower esophagus and to describe its clinical features in comparison with diffuse EE. Methods Data from 81 consecutive patients with EE were retrospectively investigated. EE was histologically defined as ≥15 eosinophils per high-power field. Based on the endoscopic appearance with a histological assessment, EE was classified as either diffuse or localized type. We compared the clinical features, including the medical treatment and natural course, between the two types. Results Of the 81 patients, 52 (64.2%) had diffuse EE, and 29 (35.8%) had localized EE. Among men patients, localized EE was significantly more common than diffuse EE. In localized EE, dysphagia and food impaction were less prevalent, and the presence of rings was significantly less common than in diffuse EE. Acid-suppressive therapy was administered to only 3 of the 29 patients with localized EE. In asymptomatic patients, especially those with localized EE, endoscopic abnormalities did not worsen but rather improved in some findings, such as with regard to furrows or exudate, during the natural course of three years without medical treatment. Conclusion Localized EE has a strong predilection for men patients and accounted for more than one third of all cases of EE. This condition appears to be less symptomatic and necessitates milder medical treatment than diffuse EE and might not worsen progressively.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDeglutition DisordersEosinophilic EsophagitisEsophagoscopyFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsSymptom AssessmentYoung Adultdiffuse esophageal eosinophiliaendoscopic phenotypeeosinophilic esophagitisesophageal eosinophilialocalized esophageal eosinophilia

Identifiers

PMID32759578
PMCPMC7759713
OpenAlexW3047479278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.