Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32759498›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2020

Shock waves promote spinal cord repair via TLR3.

Can Gollmann-Tepeköylü, Felix Nägele, Michael Graber, Leo Pölzl, Daniela Lobenwein, Jakob Hirsch, Angela An, Regina Irschick, Bernhard Röhrs, Christian Kremser and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in tissue repair and regeneration.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Can Gollmann-TepeköylüDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and.
Felix NägeleDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and.
Michael GraberDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and.
Leo PölzlDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and.
Daniela LobenweinDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and.
Jakob HirschDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and.
Angela AnDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and.
Regina IrschickDivision of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Bernhard RöhrsInstitute of Molecular Biology/Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christian KremserDepartment of Radiology.
Hubert HacklDivision of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, and.
Rosalie HuberDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and.
Serena VeneziaDivision of Neurobiology, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
David HercherLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Helga FritschDivision of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Nikolaos BonarosDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and.
Nadia StefanovaDivision of Neurobiology, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ivan TancevskiDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Diseases, Pneumology, Rheumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Dirk MeyerInstitute of Molecular Biology/Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael GrimmDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and.
Johannes HolfeldDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and.
Innsbruck Medical University · ATUniversität Innsbruck · ATAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration · ATLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains a devastating condition with poor prognosis and very limited treatment options. Affected patients are severely restricted in their daily activities. Shock wave therapy (SWT) has shown potent regenerative properties in bone fractures, wounds, and ischemic myocardium via activation of the innate immune receptor TLR3. Here, we report on the efficacy of SWT for regeneration of SCI. SWT improved motor function and decreased lesion size in WT but not Tlr3-/- mice via inhibition of neuronal degeneration and IL6-dependent recruitment and differentiation of neuronal progenitor cells. Both SWT and TLR3 stimulation enhanced neuronal sprouting and improved neuronal survival, even in human spinal cord cultures. We identified tlr3 as crucial enhancer of spinal cord regeneration in zebrafish. Our findings indicate that TLR3 signaling is involved in neuroprotection and spinal cord repair and suggest that TLR3 stimulation via SWT could become a potent regenerative treatment option.

Indexed as

Neovascularization, PhysiologicNeuroprotective AgentsSpinal Cord RegenerationAnimalsExtracorporeal Shockwave TherapyHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMotor ActivityNeuronsSpinal Cord InjuriesToll-Like Receptor 3ZebrafishNeuroprotective AgentsToll-Like Receptor 3InflammationMedical devicesNeurological disordersNeuroscienceSurgery

Identifiers

PMID32759498
PMCPMC7455067
OpenAlexW3047614651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.