Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32759476›Full record

ReviewJournal of neural engineering2020

Gels, jets, mosquitoes, and magnets: a review of implantation strategies for soft neural probes.

Nicholas V Apollo, Brendan Murphy, Kayla Prezelski, Nicolette Driscoll, Andrew G Richardson, Timothy H Lucas, Flavia Vitale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neural engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Research progress on flexible electrode technology in brain computer interface applications].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biomimicry ofBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Capturing the Electrical Activity of all Cortical Neurons: Are Solutions Within Reach?Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Chemical reviews · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicholas V ApolloDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America.
Brendan MurphyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3021-6286
Kayla PrezelskiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America.
Nicolette DriscollDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8364-460X
Andrew G RichardsonCenter for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4752-3867
Timothy H LucasCenter for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America.
Flavia VitaleDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8644-550X

Funding

Training Program in Neuroengineering and MedicineT32NS091006 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Brian Litt · 2015 to 2026
$4.1M
An Implantable Wireless Tactile Feedback SystemR01NS107550 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LUCAS, TIMOTHY H · 2019 to 2022
$2.4M
Virtual Resection to Treat EpilepsyR01NS099348 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH, LITT, BRIAN · 2016 to 2019
$2.3M
Dynamic Contributions of Identified Neurons to High Frequency OscillationsR21NS106434 · NINDS · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI TAKANO, HAJIME · 2018 to 2019
$475k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099348NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS107550NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS106434NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS091006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implantable neuroelectronic interfaces have enabled breakthrough advances in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders, as well as in fundamental studies of brain function, behavior, and disease. Intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) mapping with stereo-EEG (sEEG) depth electrodes is routinely adopted for precise epilepsy diagnostics and surgical treatment, while deep brain stimulation has become the standard of care for managing movement disorders. Intracortical microelectrode arrays for high-fidelity recordings of neural spiking activity have led to impressive demonstrations of the power of brain-machine interfaces for motor and sensory functional recovery. Yet, despite the rapid pace of technology development, the issue of establishing a safe, long-term, stable, and functional interface between neuroelectronic devices and the host brain tissue still remains largely unresolved. A body of work spanning at least the last 15 years suggests that safe, chronic integration between invasive electrodes and the brain requires a close match between the mechanical properties of man-made components and the neural tissue. In other words, the next generation of invasive electrodes should be soft and compliant, without sacrificing biological and chemical stability. Soft neuroelectronic interfaces, however, pose a new and significant surgical challenge: bending and buckling during implantation that can preclude accurate and safe device placement. In this topical review, we describe the next generation of soft electrodes and the surgical implantation methods for safe and precise insertion into brain structures. We provide an overview of the most recent innovations in the field of insertion strategies for flexible neural electrodes such as dissolvable or biodegradable carriers, microactuators, biologically-inspired support structures, and electromagnetic drives. In our analysis, we also highlight approaches developed in different fields, such as robotic surgery, which could be potentially adapted and translated to the insertion of flexible neural probes.

Indexed as

CulicidaeMagnetsAnimalsElectrodes, ImplantedGelsHumansMicroelectrodesGels

Identifiers

PMID32759476
PMCPMC8152109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.