Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32759219›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Heuristics and optimal solutions to the breadth-depth dilemma.

Rubén Moreno-Bote, Jorge Ramírez-Ruiz, Jan Drugowitsch, Benjamin Y Hayden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The whole prefrontal cortex is premotor cortex.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rubén Moreno-BoteCenter for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain; ruben.moreno@upf.edu.
Jorge Ramírez-RuizCenter for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3505-3319
Jan DrugowitschDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.ORCID 0000-0002-7846-0408
Benjamin Y HaydenDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.

Funding

Neural basis of reward-based choiceR01DA037229 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HAYDEN, BENJAMIN Y · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
Howard Hughes Medical Institute 55008742NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In multialternative risky choice, we are often faced with the opportunity to allocate our limited information-gathering capacity between several options before receiving feedback. In such cases, we face a natural trade-off between breadth-spreading our capacity across many options-and depth

Indexed as

Decision MakingHeuristicsChoice BehaviorHumansModels, TheoreticalRationalizationbounded rationalitybreadth–depth dilemmadecision makingmetareasoningrisky choice

Identifiers

PMID32759219
PMCPMC7443877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.