Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32759095›Full record

ReviewJBRA assisted reproduction2021

Factors related to infertility in Brazil and their relationship with success rates after assisted reproduction treatment: an integrative review.

Karina da Silva Maranhão, Maria Eduarda Gomes de Sena Melo Mariz, Esther Alice Dantas de Araújo, Gabriel Ribeiro de Souza, Karinna Veríssimo Meira Taveira, Danielle Barbosa Morais

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vasodilators for women undergoing fertility treatment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karina da Silva MaranhãoDepartment of Morphology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Maria Eduarda Gomes de Sena Melo MarizDepartment of Morphology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Esther Alice Dantas de AraújoDepartment of Morphology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Gabriel Ribeiro de SouzaDepartment of Morphology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Karinna Veríssimo Meira TaveiraDepartment of Morphology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Danielle Barbosa MoraisDepartment of Morphology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This integrative review evaluated the most commonly diagnosed causes of infertility in men and women in Brazil, as well as the medically assisted reproduction technologies regularly employed in these cases. We searched in four electronic databases (PubMed, including Medline; Scopus; Web of Science and LILACS), and two grey literature (Google Scholar and OpenGrey), guided by the focused question: "What are the main factors responsible for male and female infertility in Brazil, and what are its relationships with success rates after assisted reproduction treatment?". We included interventional or observational studies, without limitation by language or year of publication. Our searches in the electronic indexers recovered 1,119 articles, and after analyzing the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 27 articles composed the body of analysis for this review. We grouped the studies into four themes: factors responsible for male and female infertility, assisted reproductive technologies (ART) used in the infertility treatment, assisted reproduction procedures, and clinical predictors of success rates in ART. Despite the scarcity of studies analyzing the association between infertility and assisted reproductive technologies in Brazil, it was possible to infer that the most prevalent infertility cause in women was endometriosis, while in men it was azoospermia. The most widely assisted reproductive technology applied in the country is the intracytoplasmic injection of spermatozoa (ICSI), ensuring better success rates in the treatment of infertility for men and women.

Indexed as

Infertility, FemaleInfertility, MaleBrazilFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansMaleReproductionReproductive Techniques, AssistedSperm Injections, Intracytoplasmicintracytoplasmic sperm injectionin vitro fertilizationmale and female infertilitytechnologies of assisted reproduction

Identifiers

PMID32759095
PMCPMC7863087
OpenAlexW3048745555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.