Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32758554›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2020

Me first: Neural representations of fairness during three-party interactions.

Keith J Yoder, Jean Decety

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Keith J YoderDepartment of Psychology, 5848 S. University Ave, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, United States. Electronic address: kjyoder@uchicago.edu.
Jean DecetyDepartment of Psychology, 5848 S. University Ave, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60637, United States.

Funding

Socioemotional processing in female offenders - Resubmission 01R01MH109329 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DECETY, JEAN, KIEHL, KENT A · 2016 to 2020
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One hallmark of human morality is a deep sense of fairness. People are motivated by both self-interest and a concern for the welfare of others. However, it remains unclear whether these motivations rely on similar neural computations, and the extent to which such computations influence social decision-making when self-fairness and other-fairness motivations compete. In this study, two groups of participants engaged in the role of responder in a three-party Ultimatum Game while being scanned with functional MRI (N = 32) or while undergoing high-density electroencephalography (N = 40). In both studies, participants accepted more OtherFair offers when they themselves received fair offers. Though SelfFairness was reliably decoded from scalp voltages by 170 ms, and from hemodynamic responses in right insula and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, there was no overlap between neural representations of fairness for self and for other. Distinct neural computations and mechanisms seem to be involved when making decisions about fairness in three-party contexts, which are anchored in an egocentric, self-serving bias.

Indexed as

Decision MakingMagnetic Resonance ImagingCerebral CortexGames, ExperimentalHumansMotivationPrefrontal CortexEEGEgocentric biasFairnessfMRIMachine learningMoralityNeuroeconomicsSocial decision-making

Identifiers

PMID32758554
PMCPMC7554091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.