ArticleOphthalmology. Glaucoma
The Use of eHealth Practices by United States Patients with Self-Reported Glaucoma.
Article in Ophthalmology. Glaucoma. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality Analysis of YouTube and Facebook Videos for Glaucoma Treatment Options.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Performance of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots on Glaucoma Questions Adapted From Patient Brochures.Cureus · 2024Article
- Lifestyle Measures for Glaucoma Patients: An Objective Social Media Content Analysis.Journal of current glaucoma practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposePatient-oriented eHealth practices (e.g., scheduling appointments on the Internet, communicating with providers online) are an integral part of modern healthcare delivery. It is not known what proportion of United States patients with glaucoma use eHealth and how this use compares with those without glaucoma.
designCross-sectional study.
participantsParticipants in the 2016 through 2017 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a cross-sectional survey regarding health topics that is administered annually to a nationally representative sample of noninstitutionalized adults in the United States.
methodsBased on the NHIS complex survey design, we calculated the proportion of participants with and without glaucoma who used 5 different eHealth practices (looking up health information on the Internet, requesting or ordering a prescription medication on the Internet, scheduling a medical appointment on the Internet, communicating with healthcare provider online, and using online groups to learn about health topics) during the 12 months before the survey. We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the association between self-reported glaucoma diagnosis and use of the eHealth practices.
main outcome measuresProportion using eHealth practices and odds ratios (ORs).
resultsForty thousand four hundred sixty-five survey participants were included in the analysis; 1932 had self-reported glaucoma and 38 533 did not. For those with glaucoma, 46.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43.3%-49.0%) used at least one of the eHealth practices in the 12 months before the survey compared with 52.5% (95% CI, 51.5%-53.5%) of those without glaucoma (P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, participants with glaucoma were more likely to report use of at least 1 of the eHealth practices compared with those without glaucoma (adjusted OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.40; P = 0.005).
conclusionsIn this nationally representative United States population, nearly half of people with glaucoma reported using eHealth practices. Although a lower proportion of people with glaucoma used eHealth practices compared with those without glaucoma, this relationship actually reversed after adjusting for confounders. Because many patients with glaucoma are capable of and already using e-Health, further investment in these technologies may be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.