Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32758225›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2020

Prevention of cytomegalovirus infection after solid organ transplantation: a Bayesian network analysis.

Yu Zhang, Tao Zhou, Mingzhu Huang, Guangxiang Gu, Qiang Xia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Healthcare disparity and its associations with cytomegalovirus disease in pediatric liver transplant recipients in South Africa.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu ZhangDepartment of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1630 Dongfang Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, 200 127, China.
Tao ZhouDepartment of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1630 Dongfang Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, 200 127, China.
Mingzhu HuangDepartment of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1630 Dongfang Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, 200 127, China.
Guangxiang GuDepartment of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1630 Dongfang Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, 200 127, China. guguangxiang@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9168-7415
Qiang XiaDepartment of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1630 Dongfang Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, 200 127, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81700570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCytomegalovirus infection is one of the most common complications after solid organ transplantation. There have been several classes of antiviral drugs for the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection, such as acyclovir, valacyclovir, ganciclovir and valganciclovir.

methodsWe searched relevant prospective and multi-armed studies on PubMed from Jan. 1984 up to Mar. 2018.

resultsSeventeen prospective studies involving 2062 patients were included in the analysis. In the case of cytomegalovirus infection, the ganciclovir group (OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.09-0.57) and the valacyclovir group (OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-0.69) provided significantly better outcomes than the control group. The ganciclovir (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.13-0.86) and valacyclovir groups (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.07-0.98) showed moderate superiority compared to the acyclovir group. As for cytomegalovirus disease, the ganciclovir, valacyclovir and valganciclovir groups showed significant advantages compared with the control group (ganciclovir group: OR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.07-0.31, valacyclovir group: OR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.33, valganciclovir group: OR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.45). Similarly, the ganciclovir group (OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.12-0.71) and the valacyclovir group (OR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.72) showed better results than the acyclovir group.

conclusionValacyclovir showed to be the most efficient antiviral for the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease. Additional studies are required to evaluate putative side effects associated with valacyclovir administration.

Indexed as

AcyclovirAntiviral AgentsBayes TheoremCytomegalovirus InfectionsFemaleGanciclovirHumansMaleOrgan TransplantationValacyclovirValganciclovirAcyclovirAntiviral AgentsGanciclovirValacyclovirValganciclovirBayesian network analysisCytomegalovirusPreventionSolid organ transplantation

Identifiers

PMID32758225
PMCPMC7409489
OpenAlexW3047369617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.