Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32758168›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer compared to conventional nodal and distant staging: a retrospective single center study.

Maarten L Donswijk, Pim J van Leeuwen, Erik Vegt, Zing Cheung, Stijn W T P J Heijmink, Henk G van der Poel, Marcel P M Stokkel

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Automated lesion tracking and treatment response classification on [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Impact of PSMA PET Staging on Initial Treatment in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Comparative Performance ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. To see clear is not enough; it is the action that counts.Translational andrology and urology · 2024
    Article
  8. 7-[Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Polish journal of radiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. PSMA PET-CT in the Diagnosis and Staging of Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Role of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: We Have the Answers.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  16. StagingEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Focal unspecific bone uptake on [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maarten L DonswijkDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1066, CX. m.donswijk@nki.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2028-9713
Pim J van LeeuwenDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Erik VegtDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1066, CX.
Zing CheungDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1066, CX.
Stijn W T P J HeijminkDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Henk G van der PoelDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marcel P M StokkelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1066, CX.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [

methodsMen with newly diagnosed biopsy-proven PCa who had been staged with a conventional staging protocol including bone scintigraphy (BS) and additionally underwent [

resultsSixty-four men with intermediate and high-risk PCa were evaluated. With additional information of PET/CT, N status was upstaged in 23%, and downstaged in 9%. M status was upstaged in 13%, and downstaged in 23%. A net increase in LoC of 20% was noted, mainly regarding M status. Treatment category changed from palliative to curative in 9%, and from curative to palliative in 3%. An undecided treatment plan changed to curative in 14%, as well as to palliative in another 9%. In total, a 36% treatment category change was noted. High negative predictive value of PET/CT for M status was indicated by 27 patients that underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and reached postoperative biochemical disease-free status or had a likely other site of disease recurrence.

conclusionsPSMA PET/CT can cause considerable changes in N and M staging, as well as in management compared to conventional staging. Findings of this study support the replacement of BS and CT by PSMA PET/CT in staging primary PCa.

Indexed as

Antigens, SurfaceGallium RadioisotopesGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIAgedAged, 80 and overBone NeoplasmsFemoral NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPalliative CarePositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatectomyAntigens, SurfaceFOLH1 protein, humanGallium-68Gallium RadioisotopesGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIImpactManagementProstatePSMAStaging

Identifiers

PMID32758168
PMCPMC7409439
OpenAlexW3047132415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.