ArticleAnnals of Saudi medicine
Article in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge Assessment of Hospital Nursing Staff in Saudi Arabia RegardingNursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Clostridioides difficile infection in Saudi Arabia: Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes in a tertiary hospital setting.PloS one · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics and risk factors ofFrontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Bacterial Contamination of Environmental Surfaces of Veterinary Rehabilitation Clinics.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Article
- Epidemiology ofSaudi medical journal · 2024Article
- An epidemiological surveillance study (2021-2022): detection of a high diversity of Clostridioides difficile isolates in one tertiary hospital in Chongqing, Southwest China.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Article
- Characteristics of patients infected with Clostridioides difficile at a Saudi Tertiary Academic Medical Center and assessment of antibiotic duration.Gut pathogens · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
objectivesEstimate the prevalence of
designRetrospective record review.
settingTertiary academic medical center in Jeddah. PATIENTS AND
methodsEligible patients were adults (≥18 years old) with confirmed
main outcome measuresPrevalence rate and types of risk factors. SAMPLE SIZE: Of 1886 records, 129 patients had positive lab results and met the inclusion criteria.
resultsThe prevalence of
conclusionThe overall LIMITATIONS: Single center and retrospective design. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.