Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32757852›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology2020

Strategies to reduce the risk of platinum containing antineoplastic drug-induced ototoxicity.

Debashree Mukherjea, Asmita Dhukhwa, Amit Sapra, Priyanka Bhandari, Katlyn Woolford, Jacob Franke, Vickram Ramkumar, Leonard Rybak

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Efficacy of intratympanic infiltration of N-acetyl cysteine in cisplatin ototoxicity].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Half-Sandwich Type Platinum-Group Metal Complexes ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Special considerations in the design and implementation of pediatric otoprotection trials.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Preferential Cochleotoxicity of Cisplatin.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Debashree MukherjeaDepartment of Otolaryngology, SIU School of Medicine , Springfield, IL, USA.
Asmita DhukhwaSpringfield Combined Laboratory Facility, Novear Therapeutics LLC ., Springfield, IL, USA.
Amit SapraDepartment of Internal Medicine, SIU School of Medicine , Springfield, IL, USA.
Priyanka BhandariDepartment of Internal Medicine, SIU School of Medicine , Springfield, IL, USA.
Katlyn WoolfordDepartment of Otolaryngology, SIU School of Medicine , Springfield, IL, USA.
Jacob FrankeDepartment of Otolaryngology, SIU School of Medicine , Springfield, IL, USA.
Vickram RamkumarDepartment of Pharmacology, SIU School of Medicine , Springfield, IL, USA.
Leonard RybakDepartment of Otolaryngology, SIU School of Medicine , Springfield, IL, USA.
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine · US

Funding

ENDOGENOUS MODULATION OF OTOTOXICITY OF CISPLATINR01DC002396 · NIDCD · SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCH OF MED · PI RYBAK, LEONARD P · 1994 to 2018
$4.7M
Oral Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) for Treatment of Cisplatin OtotoxicityR01DC016835 · NIDCD · SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCH OF MED · PI RYBAK, LEONARD P · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
Drug Development for Hearing LossR43DC018258 · NIDCD · NOVEAR THERAPEUTICS LLC · PI DHUKHWA, ASMITA, MUKHERJEA, DEBASHREE · 2019 to 2019
$225k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002396NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016835NIDCD NIH HHS R43 DC018258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCisplatin is a highly effective chemotherapeutic agent against a variety of solid tumors in adults and in children. Unfortunately, a large percentage of patients suffer permanent sensorineural hearing loss. Up to 60% of children and at least 50% of adults suffer this complication that seriously compromises their quality of life. Hearing loss is due to damage to the sensory cells in the inner ear. The mechanisms of cochlear damage are still being investigated. However, it appears that inner ear damage is triggered by reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and inflammation 34. AREAS COVERED: We discuss a number of potential therapeutic targets that can be addressed to provide hearing protection. These strategies include enhancing the endogenous antioxidant pathways, heat shock proteins, G protein coupled receptors and counteracting ROS and reactive nitrogen species, and blocking pathways that produce inflammation, including TRPV1 and STAT1 36. EXPERT OPINION: Numerous potential protective agents show promise in animal models by systemic or local administration. However, clinical trials have not shown much efficacy to date with the exception of sodium thiosulfate. There is an urgent need to discover safe and effective protective agents that do not interfere with the efficacy of cisplatin against tumors yet preserve hearing 151.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsChildCisplatinHearing LossHumansNeoplasmsOtotoxicityPlatinum CompoundsProtective AgentsQuality of LifeReactive Oxygen SpeciesAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinPlatinum CompoundsProtective AgentsReactive Oxygen SpeciesCisplatinclinical trialscochleadrug targetshearing lossmechanismsototoxicitytranstympanic

Identifiers

PMID32757852
PMCPMC7606369
OpenAlexW3047863932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.