Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32757771›Full record

ArticleAssessment2021

Improving the Measurement of Functional Somatic Symptoms With Item Response Theory.

Angélica Acevedo-Mesa, Jorge Nunes Tendeiro, Annelieke Roest, Judith G M Rosmalen, Rei Monden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angélica Acevedo-MesaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5530-8764
Jorge Nunes TendeiroUniversity of Groningen, Department of Psychometrics and Statistics, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1660-3642
Annelieke RoestUniversity of Groningen, Department of Developmental Psychology, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7997-8559
Judith G M RosmalenUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6393-0032
Rei MondenUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), Groningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 40 questionnaires have been developed to assess functional somatic symptoms (FSS), but there are several methodological issues regarding the measurement of FSS. We aimed to identify which items of the somatization subscale of the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) are more informative and discriminative between persons at different levels of severity of FSS. To this end, item response theory was applied to the somatization scale of the SCL-90, collected from a sample of 82,740 adult participants without somatic conditions in the Lifelines Cohort Study. Sensitivity analyses were performed with all the participants who completed the somatization scale. Both analyses showed that Items 11 "feeling weak physically" and 12 "heavy feelings in arms or legs" were the most discriminative and informative to measure severity levels of FSS, regardless of somatic conditions. Clinicians and researchers may pay extra attention to these symptoms to augment the assessment of FSS.

Indexed as

Medically Unexplained SymptomsAdultCohort StudiesHumansSomatoform DisordersSurveys and Questionnairesfunctional somatic symptomsgraded response modelitem response theorymedically unexplained symptomsSCL-90

Identifiers

PMID32757771
PMCPMC8543564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.