Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32757459›Full record

Trial reportAsia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology2021

Long-term safety and efficacy of lanreotide autogel in Japanese patients with neuroendocrine tumors: Final results of a phase II open-label extension study.

Tetsuhide Ito, Nao Fujimori, Yoshitaka Honma, Atsushi Kudo, Susumu Hijioka, Shinji Katsushima, Yasutoshi Kimura, Akira Fukutomi, Seiichi Hisamatsu, Akihiro Nakajima and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Tetsuhide ItoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, International University of Health and Welfare Graduate School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5381-0136
Nao FujimoriDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yoshitaka HonmaHead and Neck Medical Oncology Division and Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi KudoDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Susumu HijiokaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Shinji KatsushimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Yasutoshi KimuraDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Akira FukutomiGastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Seiichi HisamatsuPharmaceutical Research & Development Division, Teijin Pharma Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiro NakajimaPharmaceutical Research & Development Division, Teijin Pharma Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira ShimatsuClinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoto Medical Center · JPTeijin (Japan) · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPFukuoka International University · JPKyushu University · JPNational Cancer Center · USSapporo Medical University Hospital · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to describe the long-term safety and efficacy of lanreotide in Japanese patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

methodsThe final analyses of a 48-week open-label phase II study (n = 32) and its extension study (n = 17) were conducted. Patients received 4-weekly subcutaneous injections of lanreotide autogel 120 mg. Safety was evaluated by adverse events. Efficacy endpoints included tumor response by RECIST and change in tumor size. Post hoc analyses including tumor growth rate were performed.

resultsThe median (range) of lanreotide exposure in the safety analysis set (n = 17) and efficacy analysis set (n = 28) were 151.4 (52-181) and 52.7 (12-181) weeks, respectively. Sixteen patients developed adverse drug reaction; of these, upper abdominal pain and urticaria were not reported before 48 weeks. No patient discontinued lanreotide or died from an adverse event. Two serious events of bile duct stones in one patient were drug-related. Partial response was observed in 2 patients (7.1%; at 60 and 108 weeks), stable disease in 20 (71.4%) and progressive disease in 6 (21.4%). The mean of the greatest change from baseline in the sum of diameters of target lesions was -5.5%. The mean (standard deviation) tumor growth rate before treatment and from baseline to last observation was 25.3% (35.7%)/month and 6.4% (9.6%)/month, respectively.

conclusionLanreotide treatment had an acceptable safety profile and was effective over long-term treatment in Japanese patients with neuroendocrine tumors. No unexpected serious adverse events developed during prolonged use of lanreotide.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeuroendocrine TumorsHumansJapanPeptides, CyclicSomatostatinAntineoplastic AgentslanreotidePeptides, CyclicSomatostatinclinical trialJapaneselanreotideneuroendocrine tumorsomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID32757459
PMCPMC8596629
OpenAlexW3047137145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.