Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32757133›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2020

Cancer treatment with gas plasma and with gas plasma-activated liquid: positives, potentials and problems of clinical translation.

Juliette C Harley, Natalka Suchowerska, David R McKenzie

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Applications of Plasma-Activated Water in Dentistry: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juliette C HarleyVectorLAB, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia. jhar9271@uni.sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9112-3369
Natalka SuchowerskaVectorLAB, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
David R McKenzieVectorLAB, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Australian Government Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Sarcoma Research CentreNational Health and Medical Research Council APP1183597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gas plasmas, created in atmospheric pressure conditions, both thermal (hot) and non-thermal (cold) are emerging as useful tools in medicine. During surgery, hot gas plasmas are useful to reduce thermal damage and seal blood vessels. Gas plasma pens use cold gas plasma to produce reactive chemical species with selective action against cancers, which can be readily exposed in surgery or treated from outside of the body. Solutions activated by cold gas plasma have potential as a novel treatment modality for treatment of less readily accessible tumours, or those with high metastatic potential. This review summarises the preclinical and clinical trial evidence currently available, as well as the challenges for translation of direct gas plasma and gas plasma-activated solution treatment into regular practice.

Indexed as

Atmospheric pressure gas plasmaCancer treatmentGas plasmaGas plasma activated solutionPlasmaRONS

Identifiers

PMID32757133
PMCPMC7429664
OpenAlexW3047039735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.