ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2020
How to Include Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials.
Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test for Children (CARATkids): A systematic review and meta-analysis of its measurement properties.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in paediatric endocrinology.BMC endocrine disorders · 2022Pooled it
- From Disease to Illness: Reframing Periodontitis Through an Anthropological Lens.Journal of periodontal research · 2026Review
- Comparative effectiveness of bone grafting vs. total hip arthroplasty in non-traumatic osteonecrosis of femoral head: a 5-year follow-up study with patient-reported outcomes.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- A standardized set of metrics to assess the quality of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management in Canada: a multidisciplinary modified Delphi study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025Article
- Development of a 3D active movement extent discrimination apparatus for testing proprioception at the ankle joint with inversion movements made in plantarflexion.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
- Quality of life reported by patients with ecchymosis following total knee arthroplasty.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Patient-reported outcome tools of acupuncture clinical trials in mainland China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Visual activities of daily living survey for retinitis pigmentosa.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2024Observational
- Cognitive interviewing validation of the Chinese version of the neurogenic bladder symptom score.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Validity and Diagnostic Ability of Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency Questionnaire in Turkish Patients.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Article
- The effect of subcutaneous and sublingual birch pollen immunotherapy on birch pollen-related food allergy: a systematic review.Frontiers in allergy · 2024Review
- Adverse event signal extraction from cancer patients' narratives focusing on impact on their daily-life activities.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Danish Linguistic Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the LIMB-Q Kids.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Reliability and validity of the ankle inversion discrimination apparatus during walking in individuals with chronic ankle instability.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- The present and the future of benzydamine: expert opinion paper.Frontiers in oral health · 2023Article
- A review of patient-reported outcomes used for regulatory approval of oncology medicinal products in the European Union between 2017 and 2020.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewPatient-reported outcome measures are increasingly important measures of patient experience, which can increase research robustness, maximise economic value and improve patient outcomes. This review outlines the benefits, challenges and practicalities of incorporating patient-reported outcome measures in clinical trials. RECENT
findingsPatient-reported outcome measures are often the best way of measuring patient symptoms and quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measures can help reduce observer bias, engage patients in the research process, and inform health service resource planning. A range of tools exist to help facilitate clinicians and researchers in selecting and utilising patient reported outcome measures. Key issues to consider when selecting an appropriate tool include the development, format and psychometric properties of the patient-reported outcome measures. The use of patient-reported outcome measures allow us to better understand the patient experience and their values. A range of tools exist to help facilitate the use of patient-reported outcome measures. This article outlines how we can incorporate patient-reported outcome measures in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32757118What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.