ArticleWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2020
[Preoperative risk clarification and anesthesia disclosure by telephone conversation].
Article in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative anxiety after face-to-face patient assessment versus preanaesthesia telemedicine (PANTEM) in adults: a randomised clinical trial.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2024Trial
- Prohibiting Babel-A call for professional remote interpreting services in pre-operation anaesthesia information.PloS one · 2025Article
- Patient Satisfaction with Remote Pre-Anesthesia Assessment Via Telephone.Telemedicine reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreoperative risk stratification, patient optimization and anesthesia disclosure are mostly carried out in the preanesthesia outpatient department in a direct conversation between physician and patient. The aim of this article is a description of the preanesthesia telephone contact as an alternative disclosure and clarification option for the clinical practice.
methodsAfter clarification of data protection and medicolegal aspects, experiences with providing information via telephone in a single center were gathered.
resultsInitially, before spinal operations pain patients with unreasonably long access routes to the preanesthesia outpatient department received clarification and disclosure via the telephone. Due to the effectiveness and the lack of medical and processual complications, after 1 year the offer of a telephone conversation was extended to all patients. In the meantime, 47% of preanesthesia conversations are now carried out by telephone. Factors relevant for success are the consent of the patient to a telephone conversation, a multimedia patient education before the telephone conversation, competence of the anesthetist in communication, documentation and a clearly defined description of the process including changeover to the direct conversation.
conclusionThe preanesthesia telephone conversation is suitable as an alternative to the preanesthesia conversation in the outpatient department. High patient satisfaction results from the patient-oriented process, avoidance of transportation routes and the participative communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32757106What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.