Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32757094›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2021

In situ vaccination with laser interstitial thermal therapy augments immunotherapy in malignant gliomas.

David H Shin, Kaitlyn F Melnick, David D Tran, Ashley P Ghiaseddin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Multimodal neuro-nanotechnology: Challenging the existing paradigm in glioblastoma therapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David H ShinDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. david.shin@neurosurgery.ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9242-7818
Kaitlyn F MelnickDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
David D TranDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Ashley P GhiaseddinDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. Ashley.ghiaseddin@neurosurgery.ufl.edu.
University of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) remains a promising advance in the treatment of primary central nervous system malignancies. As indications for its use continue to expand, there has been growing interest in its ability to induce prolonged blood brain barrier (BBB) permeability through hyperthermia, potentially increasing the effectiveness of current therapeutics including BBB-impermeant agents and immunotherapy platforms.

methodsIn this review, we highlight the mechanism of hyperthermic BBB disruption and LITT-induced immunogenic cell death in preclinical models and humans. Additionally, we summarize ongoing clinical trials evaluating a combination approach of LITT and immunotherapy, which will likely serve as the basis for future neuro-oncologic treatment paradigms.

resultsThere is evidence to suggest a highly immunogenic response to laser interstitial thermal therapy through activation of both the innate and adaptive immune response. These mechanisms have been shown to potentiate standard methods of oncologic care. There are only a limited number of clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate the utility of LITT in combination with immunotherapy.

conclusionLITT continues to be studied as a possible technique to bridge the gap between exciting preclinical results and the limited successes seen in the field of neuro-oncology. Preliminary data suggests a substantial benefit for use of LITT as a combination therapy in several clinical trials. Further investigation is required to determine whether or not this treatment paradigm can translate into long-term durable results for primary intracranial malignancies.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaLaser TherapyHumansHyperthermia, InducedImmunotherapyLasersVaccinationImmunogenic cell deathImmunotherapyIn situ vaccinationLaser interstitial thermal therapyMagnetic resonance imaging-guided laser ablationMalignant glioma

Identifiers

PMID32757094
OpenAlexW3046939055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.