Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32757044›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2020

Comparative cardiovascular safety of strontium ranelate and bisphosphonates: a multi-database study in 5 EU countries by the EU-ADR Alliance.

M S Ali, K Berencsi, K Marinier, N Deltour, S Perez-Guthann, L Pedersen, P Rijnbeek, F Lapi, M Simonetti, C Reyes and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Latest insights in disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs development.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

M S AliPharmaco- and Device Epidemiology, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. sanni.ali@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4192-7908
K BerencsiPharmaco- and Device Epidemiology, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
K MarinierDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology and Real World Evidence, Servier, Suresnes, France.
N DeltourDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology and Real World Evidence, Servier, Suresnes, France.
S Perez-GuthannRTI Health Solutions, Barcelona, Spain.
L PedersenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
P RijnbeekDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
F LapiHealth Search, Italian College of General Practitioners and Primary Care, Florence, Italy.
M SimonettiHealth Search, Italian College of General Practitioners and Primary Care, Florence, Italy.
C ReyesGREMPAL Research Group, Idiap Jordi Gol Primary Care Research Institute and CIBERFes, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain.
J Van der LeiDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
M SturkenboomJulius Global Health, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands.
D Prieto-AlhambraPharmaco- and Device Epidemiology, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Aarhus University · DKErasmus MC · NLServier (France) · FRSocietà Italiana di Medicina Generale · ITUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Erasmus Medical centre .National Institute for Health Research Clinician Scientist award CS-2013-13-012NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford. .Servier through a research grant to the EU-ADR Alliance .
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strontium ranelate use, compared with oral bisphosphonates, is not associated with increased risk of AMI in patients with no contraindications for SR use. However, current strontium ranelate (compared with current bisphosphonate) appears associated with 25-30% excess risk of VTE and 35% excess risk of CVDeath.

introductionEvaluate the risk of cardiac and thromboembolic events among new users of SR and oral BPs without contraindications for SR.

methodsWe conducted three multi-national, multi-database (Aarhus-Denmark, HSD-Italy, IPCI-Netherlands, SIDIAP-Spain, THIN-UK) case-control studies nested within a cohort of new users of SR/BP. We matched cases of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), and cardiovascular death (CVDeath), up to 10 controls on gender, year of birth, index date, and country. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) according to current SR vs current BP use and current vs past SR use, adjusting for potential confounders. Data were pooled using random effects meta-analysis.

resultsNo excess risk of AMI (5477 cases/54,674 controls) was found with current SR vs current BP (OR 0.89 (95%CI 0.70, 1.12)) nor with current vs past SR use (0.71(0.56, 0.91)). For VTE (5614 cases/6036 controls), an excess risk was found with current SR compared with current BP use, 1.24 (0.96, 1.61), and current vs past SR use, 1.30 (1.04, 1.62). For CVDeath (3019 cases/29,871 controls), an increased risk was seen with current SR vs current BP use, 1.35 (1.02, 1.80), but not with current vs past SR use (0.68 (0.48, 0.96)).

conclusionIn patients without contraindications for SR, we found no evidence of an increased risk of AMI but a 25-30% excess risk of VTE and a 35% excess risk of CVDeath with current SR vs current BP users. This is despite a reduction in risk in CVDeath with current vs past SR users. The latter disparity could still be partially explained by cessation of preventative therapies in end-of-life or residual confounding by indication.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesCase-Control StudiesHumansItalyNetherlandsSpainThiophenesBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesstrontium ranelateThiophenesAcute myocardial infarctionCardiovascular deathEmbolismOral bisphosphonatesOsteoporosisSafetyStrontium ranelateVenous thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID32757044
OpenAlexW3047175119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.