Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32757031›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2020

[Revision surgery after resection arthroplasty of the thumb saddle joint].

S Löw, S Kiesel, C K Spies

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S LöwPraxis für Handchirurgie und Unfallchirurgie, Ledermarkt 8-10, 97080, Bad Mergentheim, Deutschland. steffen_loew@hotmail.com.
S KieselKlinik für Handchirurgie, Rhön-Klinikum Campus Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt a.d. Saale, Deutschland.
C K SpiesHandchirurgie, Vulpius Klinik, Bad Rappenau, Deutschland.
Rhön-Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResection arthroplasty still is the gold standard for the treatment of basal thumb arthritis. In most patients, satisfactory results can be expected. However, the few patients with persisting problems are a challenge for the hand surgeon. They may complain of neuromas, tendinitis of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendon, impingement and/or proximalization of the first metacarpal, arthritis of the scaphotrapezoidal joint or carpal collapse in the case of pre-existing scapholunate instability. DIAGNOSIS: This includes subtle clinical examination. Radiography may be completed by a CT scan. Probational infiltration is a helpful tool to confirm diagnosis and may be the first step of a conservative treatment, when supplemented by orthoses. TREATMENT: Revision surgery is guided by the nature of the present problem. Neurolysis should be indicated cautiously and performed according to existing principles. FCR tendinitis is treated by release or resection of the tendon. Impingement of the first metacarpal is treated by repeat resection and tendon interposition, proximalization by additional suspension arthroplasty or by arthrodesis between the bases of the first and second metacarpals. In the case of scaphotrapezoidal arthritis, the proximal third of the trapezoid is resected, whereas destabilization of the scaphoid with consecutive carpal collapse may necessitate midcarpal fusion.

Indexed as

ArthroplastyThumbHumansReoperationTendonsWrist JointBasal thumb arthritisImpingementMetacarpal bonesOs scaphoideumTendon interposition

Identifiers

PMID32757031
OpenAlexW3047355079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.