ArticleRheumatology international2020
A prospective study of novel disease activity indices for ankylosing spondylitis.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Adult to Adolescent: Alignment in Clinical Trials and Outcomes in Axial Spondyloarthritis.Arthritis care & research · 2026Review
- Core Set of Responsive and Discriminatory Measures for Use in Pragmatic Trials of Youth With Axial Juvenile Spondyloarthritis.Arthritis care & research · 2025Article
- Diagnosis, monitoring, and management of axial spondyloarthritis.Rheumatology international · 2024Review
- SASDAS: a practical tool to measure disease activity in axSpa patients. Comments on "a prospective study of novel disease activity indices for ankylosing spondylitis".Rheumatology international · 2021Article
- Exploring simplified disease activity indices in Ankylosing Spondylitis in different populations is the need of the hour.Rheumatology international · 2021Article
- Low BASDAI score alone is not a good predictor of anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment efficacy in ankylosing spondylitis: a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an ongoing quest for robust disease activity measures in Ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Thus, we prospectively validated two new disease activity indices, Simplified AS Disease Activity Score (SASDAS) and modified Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (JSpADA). Patients with AS were assessed for BASDAI, ASDAS and other outcome measures at baseline and 3 months. Comparisons were drawn between those with juvenile onset, early disease and peripheral involvement, with the rest. Fisher's r to Z transformation was used to compare correlations. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to calculate cutoffs for inactive, low, high and very high disease activity. Of the 107 patients (mean age-29 years) of 6-years long disease, 38.3% had a juvenile onset. SASDAS and modified JSpADA exhibited excellent correlation with BASDAI and ASDAS (all p < 0.001) and were higher in active vs. inactive disease. Treatment responders had a greater fall in SASDAS and modified JSpADA as compared to non-responders. The novel scores were higher in those with peripheral disease. Only SASDAS could discriminate early from late disease. Based on the previously proposed cutoffs, optimal scores for inactive, moderate, high and very high disease activity were deduced. SASDAS-CRP showed better internal consistency than SASDAS-ESR and correlated better with ASDAS-CRP in late disease (Z = 3.04; p = 002) and those with adult onset disease (Z = 2.18; p = 0.03). SASDAS and Modified JSpADA perform as well as standard complex scores and have potential for simpler daily use. From our analyses, SASDAS with CRP performs better than SASDAS-ESR, pending further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.