Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32757023›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2020

Factors involved in prolapse recurrence one year after anterior vaginal repair.

Irene Diez-Itza, Marisa Avila, Sabiñe Uranga, Maria Belar, Arantza Lekuona, Alicia Martin

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Irene Diez-ItzaServicio de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain. idiezi@sego.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8077-6655
Marisa AvilaServicio de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain.
Sabiñe UrangaServicio de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain.
Maria BelarServicio de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain.
Arantza LekuonaServicio de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain.
Alicia MartinServicio de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
University of the Basque Country · ESBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESHospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe aim of this study was to identify which factors are associated with anatomic and symptomatic prolapse recurrence in the anterior compartment 1 year after traditional anterior vaginal repair. Our study hypothesis was that major defects in pelvic floor support structures before surgery are associated with higher recurrence rates.

methodsThis was a prospective multicenter study including women with symptomatic anterior compartment prolapse who underwent primary vaginal surgery. Prolapse examination was performed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system, prolapse symptoms were described using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form (PFDI-20), and levator ani avulsion and hiatal area were identified by translabial 3D ultrasonography.

resultsDuring the inclusion period, 455 patients were recruited and 442 (97.1%) attended the 1-year follow-up. In three cases, ultrasound data were not available, and the remaining 439 formed the study group. Anatomic and symptomatic recurrence rates were 45.1% and 6.8%, respectively. Levator avulsion increased the risk of anatomic (OR: 1.96) and symptomatic (OR: 2.60) recurrence; abnormal distensibility of the levator hiatal area increased the risk of anatomic (OR: 2.51) and symptomatic (OR: 2.43) recurrence; advanced prolapse increased the risk of anatomic recurrence: POP-Q stage 3 (OR: 2.34) and POP-Q stage 4 (OR: 5.47).

conclusionsMajor defects in pelvic floor support structures before surgery are associated with higher recurrence rates 1 year after native tissue vaginal repair. Advanced stage of prolapse increases the risk of anatomic recurrence, while levator avulsion and abnormal distensibility of the levator hiatus area increase the risk of both anatomic and symptomatic recurrence.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapseFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansPelvic FloorProspective StudiesUltrasonographyVaginaAnatomic recurrenceAnterior colporrhaphyRisk factorsSymptomatic recurrenceTraditional anterior vaginal repair

Identifiers

PMID32757023
OpenAlexW3047103838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.