Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32756880›Full record

ArticleJAMA dermatology2020

Assessment and Treatment Outcomes of Persistent Radiation-Induced Alopecia in Patients With Cancer.

Gregory S Phillips, Morgan E Freret, Danielle Novetsky Friedman, Sabrina Trelles, Oluwaseun Kukoyi, Azael Freites-Martinez, Robin H Unger, Joseph J Disa, Leonard H Wexler, Christopher L Tinkle and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Insights from initial experience for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with proton therapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Dosimetric comparison of advanced radiation techniques for scalp-sparing in low-grade gliomas.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Human enteroids as a tool to study conventional and ultra-high dose rate radiation.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gregory S PhillipsDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Morgan E FreretDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Danielle Novetsky FriedmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Sabrina TrellesDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Oluwaseun KukoyiDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Azael Freites-MartinezDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Robin H UngerDepartment of Dermatology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York.
Joseph J DisaDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Leonard H WexlerDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Christopher L TinkleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
James G MechalakosDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Stephen W DuszaDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Kathryn BealDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Suzanne L WoldenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Mario E LacoutureDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMount Sinai Medical Center · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversidad Europea de Madrid · ES

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Summer research experiences for medical students supervised by faculty mentorsR25CA020449 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Charlotte Eielson Ariyan · 1985 to 2026
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R25 CA020449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Persistent radiation-induced alopecia (pRIA) and its management have not been systematically described. Objective: To characterize pRIA in patients with primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors or head and neck sarcoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study of patients from January 1, 2011, to January 30, 2019, was conducted at 2 large tertiary care hospitals and comprehensive cancer centers. Seventy-one children and adults diagnosed with primary CNS tumors or head and neck sarcomas were evaluated for pRIA. Main Outcomes and Measures: The clinical and trichoscopic features, scalp radiation dose-response relationship, and response to topical minoxidil were assessed using standardized clinical photographs of the scalp, trichoscopic images, and radiotherapy treatment plans. Results: Of the 71 patients included (median [range] age, 27 [4-75] years; 51 female [72%]), 64 (90%) had a CNS tumor and 7 (10%) had head and neck sarcoma. Alopecia severity was grade 1 in 40 of 70 patients (56%), with localized (29 of 54 [54%]), diffuse (13 of 54 [24%]), or mixed (12 of 54 [22%]) patterns. The median (range) estimated scalp radiation dose was 39.6 (15.1-50.0) Gy; higher dose (odds ratio [OR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.04-1.28) and proton irradiation (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 1.05-30.8) were associated with greater alopecia severity (P < .001), and the dose at which 50% of patients were estimated to have severe (grade 2) alopecia was 36.1 Gy (95% CI, 33.7-39.6 Gy). Predominant trichoscopic features included white patches (16 of 28 [57%]); in 15 patients, hair-shaft caliber negatively correlated with scalp dose (correlation coefficient, -0.624; P = .01). The association between hair density and scalp radiation dose was not statistically significant (-0.381; P = .16). Twenty-eight of 34 patients (82%) responded to topical minoxidil, 5% (median follow-up, 61 [interquartile range, 21-105] weeks); 4 of 25 (16%) topical minoxidil recipients with clinical images improved in severity grade. Two patients responded to hair transplantation and 1 patient responded to plastic surgical reconstruction. Conclusions and Relevance: Persistent radiation-induced alopecia among patients with primary CNS tumors or head and neck sarcomas represents a dose-dependent phenomenon that has distinctive clinical and trichoscopic features. The findings of this study suggest that topical minoxidil and procedural interventions may have benefit in the treatment of pRIA.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAdolescentAdultAgedAlopeciaCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolCranial IrradiationDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHairHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinoxidil

Identifiers

PMID32756880
PMCPMC7407362
OpenAlexW3046979713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.