ArticlePloS one2020
Disrupting resilient criminal networks through data analysis: The case of Sicilian Mafia.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Mobile Phone Data in Crime Applications: A Coherent Taxonomy Based on Data Types and Analysis Perspectives, Challenges, and Future Research Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- IdentifyingInfluential Nodes in Complex Networks Based on the Integration of Smallest-Cycle and Non-Smallest-Cycle Features.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Explainable multi-agent learning for adaptive terrorist network disruption.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Marrying for power: Gendered alliances in mafias.PloS one · 2026Article
- Assessing the value of objective suspicious transactions in Dutch anti-money laundering investigations: a network approach.EPJ data science · 2026Article
- Structural roles and gender disparities in corruption networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Early warning signals for predicting cryptomarket vendor success using dark net forum networks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- The Steiner tree Prosecutor: Revealing and disrupting criminal networks through a single suspect.PloS one · 2024Article
- Network Analytics Enabled by Generating a Pool of Network Variants from Noisy Data.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Reconstructing Sparse Multiplex Networks with Application to Covert Networks.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- EXTENDED STOCHASTIC BLOCK MODELS WITH APPLICATION TO CRIMINAL NETWORKS.The annals of applied statistics · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compared to other types of social networks, criminal networks present particularly hard challenges, due to their strong resilience to disruption, which poses severe hurdles to Law-Enforcement Agencies (LEAs). Herein, we borrow methods and tools from Social Network Analysis (SNA) to (i) unveil the structure and organization of Sicilian Mafia gangs, based on two real-world datasets, and (ii) gain insights as to how to efficiently reduce the Largest Connected Component (LCC) of two networks derived from them. Mafia networks have peculiar features in terms of the links distribution and strength, which makes them very different from other social networks, and extremely robust to exogenous perturbations. Analysts also face difficulties in collecting reliable datasets that accurately describe the gangs' internal structure and their relationships with the external world, which is why earlier studies are largely qualitative, elusive and incomplete. An added value of our work is the generation of two real-world datasets, based on raw data extracted from juridical acts, relating to a Mafia organization that operated in Sicily during the first decade of 2000s. We created two different networks, capturing phone calls and physical meetings, respectively. Our analysis simulated different intervention procedures: (i) arresting one criminal at a time (sequential node removal); and (ii) police raids (node block removal). In both the sequential, and the node block removal intervention procedures, the Betweenness centrality was the most effective strategy in prioritizing the nodes to be removed. For instance, when targeting the top 5% nodes with the largest Betweenness centrality, our simulations suggest a reduction of up to 70% in the size of the LCC. We also identified that, due the peculiar type of interactions in criminal networks (namely, the distribution of the interactions' frequency), no significant differences exist between weighted and unweighted network analysis. Our work has significant practical applications for perturbing the operations of criminal and terrorist networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.