Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32756119›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2020

Evaluation of imaging findings and prognostic factors after whole-brain radiotherapy for carcinomatous meningitis from breast cancer: A retrospective analysis.

Yukinori Okada, Tatsuyuki Abe, Mio Shinozaki, Akiko Tanaka, Mariko Kobayashi, Gomi Hiromichi, Yoshihide Kanemaki, Naoki Nakamura, Yasuyuki Kojima

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yukinori OkadaDepartment of Radiology.ORCID 0000-0002-6382-0159
Tatsuyuki AbeDepartment of Radiology.
Mio ShinozakiDepartment of Radiology.
Akiko TanakaDepartment of Radiology.
Mariko KobayashiDepartment of Radiology.
Gomi HiromichiDepartment of Radiology.
Yoshihide KanemakiDepartment of Radiology.
Naoki NakamuraDepartment of Radiology.
Yasuyuki KojimaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the imaging findings and prognostic factors after whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with carcinomatous meningitis from breast cancer.A retrospective analysis of imaging data and prognostic factors was performed in patients treated with whole-brain radiotherapy or whole-brain/spine radiotherapy immediately after the first diagnosis of carcinomatous meningitis from breast cancer at our hospital from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018. Statistical significance was set at P < .05 (two-tailed).All patients (n = 31) were females with the mean age of 58.0 ± 11.0 years. The breast cancer subtypes were luminal (n = 14, 45.1%), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (n = 9, 29.0%), and triple-negative (n = 8, 26.0%) breast cancer. Brain metastasis and abnormal contrast enhancement in the sulci were observed in 21 (67.7%) and 24 (80.6%) patients, respectively. The median survival time after cancerous meningitis diagnosis was 62 (range, 6-657) days. Log-rank test showed significant differences in median survival time after cancerous meningitis diagnosis: 18.0 days for subjects treated with 30 Gy in < 10 fractions (n = 7) vs 78.5 days for subjects treated with 30 Gy in ≥10 fractions (n = 24) (P < .01) and 23.0 days for the triple-negative subtype vs 78.5 days for the other subtype (P < .01) groups. Univariate analysis using the Cox regression model showed significant differences in median survival time after cancerous meningitis diagnosis between the group treated with 30 Gy in <10 fractions and the group treated in ≥10 fractions (hazard ratio [HR] 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.26; P < .01), and between the triple-negative subtype and the other subtypes (HR = 5.48; 95% CI, 1.88-16.0; P < .01) groups.Discontinuation of whole-brain radiotherapy and the presence of triple-negative breast cancer were indicators of poor prognosis.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMeningeal CarcinomatosisMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID32756119
PMCPMC7402782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.