SynthesisMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2021
Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty with Large Diameter Heads: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of mid-term outcomes in 334 developmental dysplasia hips treated with total hip arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Articular noise after Delta-on-Delta revision hip arthroplasty at a long-term follow-up: incidence and impact on clinical outcomes.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Factors Associated With Complications in 176 Crowe IV Hips Treated With Total Hip Arthroplasty.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Bony ankylosis adversely affects postoperative hip function in patients with ankylosing spondylitis undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study of 319 consecutive patients.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Head size in Delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: a comparative registry study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Mid-term outcomes after total hip arthroplasty in 106 Crowe II/III hips: different hip center positions.European journal of medical research · 2022Article
- Fourth-Generation Ceramic-on-Ceramic THA in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.Orthopaedic surgery · 2022Article
- Personalized Hip Joint Replacement with Large Diameter Head: Current Concepts.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Monobloc press-fit cups with large-diameter bearings are safe in revision total hip arthroplasty.Orthopedic reviews · 2022Article
- Arthroscopic evaluation and treatment of a squeaking hip. A case report.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2020Article
- Total hip arthroplasty with monobloc press-fit acetabular components and large-diameter bearings for atypical acetabula is safe: a consecutive case series of 125 hips with mean follow-up of 9 years.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with large heads (>36 mm) were introduced to reduce dislocation rates and restore the hip anatomy as closely as possible to the native one. To date, the literature is scarce and fragmented; a review is desirable to point out the outcomes and the possible specific complications (noise, groin pain, and taperosis). A systematic review about large-diameter COC THAs was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched using the terms "large", "big", "head", "hip", and "ceramic." The methodological quality of the papers was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies) score. Seven papers (level of evidence: 5 case series and 2 case-control studies) met the inclusion criteria. Clinical outcomes were excellent in >90% of the patients. Groin pain was reported in only 1 article (7%). Radiological outcomes were positive. Minimal revision rates (<2%) were reported at short- to mid-term follow-ups. Dislocation rates were usually <1%. No bearing surfaces failed. No case of trunnionitis was reported. Noise occurred in up to 30% of the patients, mostly squeaking. The noise did not influence clinical outcomes or patients' satisfaction. Noise was inconstantly associated with component positioning, younger age, high articular excursions, and larger sizes. Large-diameter heads in COC THAs (≥40 mm) showed promising clinical and radiological outcomes with minimal revision rates. Noise is a cause of concern and should be carefully evaluated at longer follow-ups and in larger, prospective, and specifically designed case series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.