Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32755886›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Using Machine Learning to Optimize the Quality of Survey Data: Protocol for a Use Case in India.

Neha Shah, Diwakar Mohan, Jean Juste Harisson Bashingwa, Osama Ummer, Arpita Chakraborty, Amnesty E LeFevre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. National guidelines for data quality in surveys: An overview.The Indian journal of medical research · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neha ShahDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9450-604X
Diwakar MohanDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7532-366X
Jean Juste Harisson BashingwaFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, & Member of the Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1433-4397
Osama UmmerOxford Policy Management, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4189-5328
Arpita ChakrabortyOxford Policy Management, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0515-3420
Amnesty E LeFevreDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8437-7240

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData quality is vital for ensuring the accuracy, reliability, and validity of survey findings. Strategies for ensuring survey data quality have traditionally used quality assurance procedures. Data analytics is an increasingly vital part of survey quality assurance, particularly in light of the increasing use of tablets and other electronic tools, which enable rapid, if not real-time, data access. Routine data analytics are most often concerned with outlier analyses that monitor a series of data quality indicators, including response rates, missing data, and reliability of coefficients for test-retest interviews. Machine learning is emerging as a possible tool for enhancing real-time data monitoring by identifying trends in the data collection, which could compromise quality.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe methods for the quality assessment of a household survey using both traditional methods as well as machine learning analytics.

methodsIn the Kilkari impact evaluation's end-line survey amongst postpartum women (n=5095) in Madhya Pradesh, India, we plan to use both traditional and machine learning-based quality assurance procedures to improve the quality of survey data captured on maternal and child health knowledge, care-seeking, and practices. The quality assurance strategy aims to identify biases and other impediments to data quality and includes seven main components: (1) tool development, (2) enumerator recruitment and training, (3) field coordination, (4) field monitoring, (5) data analytics, (6) feedback loops for decision making, and (7) outcomes assessment. Analyses will include basic descriptive and outlier analyses using machine learning algorithms, which will involve creating features from time-stamps, "don't know" rates, and skip rates. We will also obtain labeled data from self-filled surveys, and build models using k-folds cross-validation on a training data set using both supervised and unsupervised learning algorithms. Based on these models, results will be fed back to the field through various feedback loops.

resultsData collection began in late October 2019 and will span through March 2020. We expect to submit quality assurance results by August 2020.

conclusionsMachine learning is underutilized as a tool to improve survey data quality in low resource settings. Study findings are anticipated to improve the overall quality of Kilkari survey data and, in turn, enhance the robustness of the impact evaluation. More broadly, the proposed quality assurance approach has implications for data capture applications used for special surveys as well as in the routine collection of health information by health workers. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/17619.

Indexed as

data analyticshousehold survey datamachine learningmonitoringquality assurancereal-time data

Identifiers

PMID32755886
PMCPMC7439143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.