Trial reportNeuroImage. Clinical2020
Distance to white matter trajectories is associated with treatment response to internal capsule deep brain stimulation in treatment-refractory depression.
Trial report in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of deep brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- The role of lipids in neuromodulation for psychiatric disorders: A narrative review.Translational psychiatry · 2026Review
- Challenges and opportunities of acquiring cortical recordings for chronic adaptive deep brain stimulation.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Joint Anatomical, Histological, and Imaging Investigation of the Midbrain Target Region for Superolateral Medial Forebrain Bundle Deep Brain Stimulation.Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Deep brain stimulation for refractory major depressive disorder: a comprehensive review.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Review
- Brain white matter changes and their associations with non-motor dysfunction in orthostatic hypotension in α-synucleinopathy: A NODDI study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Presurgical structural imaging and clinical outcome in combined bed nucleus of the stria terminalis-nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.General psychiatry · 2024Article
- Psychopathological network for early-onset post-stroke depression symptoms.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Prefrontal network engagement by deep brain stimulation in limbic hubs.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- White Matter Microstructure Associated with the Antidepressant Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Review of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Deep Brain Stimulation for Depression.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022Review
- SPECTRE-A novel dMRI visualization technique for the display of cerebral connectivity.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Tractographic description of major subcortical projection pathways passing the anterior limb of the internal capsule. Corticopetal organization of networks relevant for psychiatric disorders.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is an innovative treatment for treatment-refractory depression. DBS is usually targeted at specific anatomical landmarks, with patients responding to DBS in approximately 50% of cases. Attention has recently shifted to white matter tracts to explain DBS response, with initial open-label trials targeting white matter tracts yielding much higher response rates (>70%). OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Our aim was to associate distance to individual white matter tracts around the stimulation target in the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule to treatment response.
methodsWe performed diffusion magnetic resonance tractography of the superolateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle and the anterior thalamic radiation in fourteen patients that participated in our randomized clinical trial. We combined the tract reconstructions with the postoperative images to identify the DBS leads and estimated the distance between tracts and leads, which we subsequently associated with treatment response.
resultsStimulation closer to both tracts was significantly correlated to a larger symptom decrease (r = 0.61, p = 0.02), suggesting that stimulation more proximal to the tracts was beneficial. Biophysical modelling indicated that 37.5% of tracts were even outside the volume of activated tissue. There was no difference in lead placement with respect to anatomical landmarks, which could mean that differences in treatment response were driven by individual differences in white matter anatomy.
conclusionsOur results suggest that deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule could benefit from targeting white matter bundles. We recommend acquiring diffusion magnetic resonance data for each individual patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.