Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32755802›Full record

Trial reportNeuroImage. Clinical2020

Distance to white matter trajectories is associated with treatment response to internal capsule deep brain stimulation in treatment-refractory depression.

Luka C Liebrand, Samuel J Natarajan, Matthan W A Caan, P Richard Schuurman, Pepijn van den Munckhof, Bart de Kwaasteniet, Judy Luigjes, Isidoor O Bergfeld, Damiaan Denys, Guido A van Wingen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Deep Brain Stimulation for Depression.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luka C LiebrandAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129 B, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: L.C.Liebrand@amsterdamumc.nl.
Samuel J NatarajanAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129 B, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Matthan W A CaanAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
P Richard SchuurmanAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurosurgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Pepijn van den MunckhofAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurosurgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Bart de KwaastenietAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129 B, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Judy LuigjesAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129 B, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Isidoor O BergfeldAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129 B, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Damiaan DenysAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129 B, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Meibergdreef 47, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Guido A van WingenAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129 B, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is an innovative treatment for treatment-refractory depression. DBS is usually targeted at specific anatomical landmarks, with patients responding to DBS in approximately 50% of cases. Attention has recently shifted to white matter tracts to explain DBS response, with initial open-label trials targeting white matter tracts yielding much higher response rates (>70%). OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Our aim was to associate distance to individual white matter tracts around the stimulation target in the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule to treatment response.

methodsWe performed diffusion magnetic resonance tractography of the superolateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle and the anterior thalamic radiation in fourteen patients that participated in our randomized clinical trial. We combined the tract reconstructions with the postoperative images to identify the DBS leads and estimated the distance between tracts and leads, which we subsequently associated with treatment response.

resultsStimulation closer to both tracts was significantly correlated to a larger symptom decrease (r = 0.61, p = 0.02), suggesting that stimulation more proximal to the tracts was beneficial. Biophysical modelling indicated that 37.5% of tracts were even outside the volume of activated tissue. There was no difference in lead placement with respect to anatomical landmarks, which could mean that differences in treatment response were driven by individual differences in white matter anatomy.

conclusionsOur results suggest that deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule could benefit from targeting white matter bundles. We recommend acquiring diffusion magnetic resonance data for each individual patient.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantWhite MatterDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansInternal CapsuleAnterior limb of the internal capsuleDeep brain stimulationDiffusion MRITractographyTreatment-refractory depression

Identifiers

PMID32755802
PMCPMC7396898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.