Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32755580›Full record

ArticleCell reports2020

In Vivo Estimates of Liver Metabolic Flux Assessed by

Clinton M Hasenour, Mohsin Rahim, Jamey D Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sarco/Endoplasmic Reticulum CaJournal of the American Heart Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. KiScience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. GlobalNature metabolism · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Toward Systems-Level Metabolic Analysis in Endocrine Disorders and Cancer.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Mapping endocrine networks by stable isotope tracing.Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research · 2022
    Review
  18. Cancer & metabolism · 2022
    Article
  19. The [Lipids · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Clinton M HasenourDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
Mohsin RahimDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
Jamey D YoungDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA; Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA. Electronic address: j.d.young@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Translational Analysis CoreP30DK058404 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MARY Kay WASHINGTON · 2002 to 2026
$29.9M
Vanderbilt Mouse Metabolic Physiology CenterU24DK059637 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WASSERMAN, DAVID H · 2001 to 2015
$14.9M
Integrated Training in Engineering and DiabetesT32DK101003 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Jamey D. Young · 2014 to 2026
$3.9M
In Vivo 2H/13C Metabolic Flux Analysis of NASH PathogenesisR01DK106348 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, JAMEY D. · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Tools for Leveraging High-Resolution MS Detection of Stable Isotope Enrichments to Upgrade the Information Content of Metabolomics DatasetsU01CA235508 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ALLEN, DOUG, YOUNG, JAMEY D. · 2018 to 2021
$1.7M
Gas Chromotograph- Triple Quadrupole Tandem Mass Spectrometer (GC-QqQ)S10OD025199 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, JAMEY D. · 2018 to 2018
$365k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA235508NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK058404NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK106348NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK101003NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK059637NIH HHS S10 OD025199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isotope-based assessment of metabolic flux is achieved through a judicious balance of measurements and assumptions. Recent publications debate the validity of key assumptions used to model stable isotope labeling of liver metabolism in vivo. Here, we examine the controversy surrounding estimates of liver citric acid cycle and gluconeogenesis fluxes using a flexible modeling platform that enables rigorous testing of standard assumptions. Fasted C57BL/6J mice are infused with [

Indexed as

Isotope LabelingMetabolic Flux AnalysisAnimalsCarbon IsotopesCitric Acid CycleFumaratesHydrogenLactic AcidLiverMaleMice, Inbred C57BLModels, BiologicalOxaloacetic AcidPropionatesPyruvic AcidCarbon-13Carbon IsotopesFumaratesHydrogenLactic AcidOxaloacetic AcidPropionatesPyruvic Acidanaplerosiscitric acid cycleCori cyclingflux regressiongluconeogenesisliver metabolismmetabolic flux analysispyruvate cyclingpyruvate kinasestable isotope

Identifiers

PMID32755580
PMCPMC7451222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.