Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32755008›Full record

ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2020

'We walked side by side through the whole thing': A mixed-methods study of key elements of community-based participatory research partnerships between rural Aboriginal communities and researchers.

Mieke Snijder, Annemarie Wagemakers, Bianca Calabria, Bonita Byrne, Jamie O'Neill, Ronald Bamblett, Alice Munro, Anthony Shakeshaft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Comprehensive Review of Optimal Approaches to Co-Design in Health with First Nations Australians.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Tuberculosis care designed with barramarrany (family): Participatory action research that prioritised partnership, healthy housing and nutrition.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mieke SnijderInstitute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8766-3015
Annemarie WagemakersHealth and Society, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Bianca CalabriaNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Bonita ByrneNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jamie O'NeillNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ronald BamblettNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Alice MunroWestern New South Wales Local Health District, Orange, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8914-3504
Anthony ShakeshaftNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

NDARC Education TrusteesNSW Ministry of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo advance the rural practice in working with Aboriginal communities by (a) identifying the extent of community partners' participation in and (b) operationalising the key elements of three community-based participatory research partnerships between university-based researchers and Australian rural Aboriginal communities.

designA mixed-methods study. Quantitative survey and qualitative one-on-one interviews with local project implementation committee members and group interviews with other community partners and project documentation.

settingThree rural Aboriginal communities in New South Wales.

participantsThirty-seven community partners in three community-based participatory research partnerships of which 22 were members of local project implementation committees and 15 were other community partners who implemented activities.

interventionCommunity-based participatory research partnerships to develop, implement and evaluate community-based responses to alcohol-related harms. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Community partners' extent of and experiences with participation in the community-based participatory research partnership and their involvement in the development and implementation processes.

resultsCommunity partners' participation varied between communities and between project phases within communities. Contributing to the community-based participatory research partnerships were four key elements of the participatory process: unique expertise of researchers and community-based partners, openness to learn from each other, trust and community leadership.

conclusionTo advance the research practice in rural Aboriginal communities, equitable partnerships between Aboriginal community and research partners are encouraged to embrace the unique expertise of the partners, encourage co-learning and implement community leadership to build trust.

Indexed as

Cultural CharacteristicsCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity ParticipationCooperative BehaviorFemaleHealth Services, IndigenousHumansNew South WalesProgram EvaluationRural PopulationAboriginal Australiansalcoholcommunity-based participatory researchmixed methodspartnershipsrural

Identifiers

PMID32755008
PMCPMC7508167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.