Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32754880›Full record

SynthesisCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2021

Perceptions about cannabis use during pregnancy: a rapid best-framework qualitative synthesis.

Sarah J Weisbeck, Katherine S Bright, Carla S Ginn, Jacqueline M Smith, K Alix Hayden, Catherine Ringham

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The impact of cannabinoids on reproductive function.Reproduction (Cambridge, England) · 2025
    Review
  14. American Indian women's perceptions of perinatal cannabis use.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah J WeisbeckFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. N.W, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2835-0179
Katherine S BrightFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. N.W, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6607-7655
Carla S GinnFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. N.W, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada. cginn@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-8343-1388
Jacqueline M SmithFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. N.W, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1567-7391
K Alix HaydenLibraries and Cultural Resources, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. N.W, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0057-1327
Catherine RinghamFaculty of Nursing, Alberta Health Services, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. N.W, Calgary, AB, T3N 1N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8124-4204

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA rapid review was conducted in order to produce a streamlined and time-limited systematic evidence review to understand women's perceptions, beliefs, and knowledge of the risks associated with cannabis use during pregnancy.

methodsMEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, EMBASE, PsycINFO (OVID interface), and CINAHL (Ebsco interface) databases were searched from inception to March 2019. Qualitative and descriptive studies, and reviews that addressed pregnant women's perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes about personal cannabis use were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using valid tools and data extraction was guided by suitable checklists. Full text of 18 citations was retrieved and reviewed, and 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. SYNTHESIS: Women who continued to use cannabis during pregnancy often perceived less risk compared with nonusers. Their uncertainty regarding adverse consequences, perceived therapeutic effects, and lack of communication with health care providers contributed to cannabis use. Women perceived this lack of counselling as an indication that outcomes of cannabis use while pregnant were not significant.

conclusionThis synthesis highlights important factors in women's decision-making processes regarding use or cessation of cannabis during pregnancy. In addition, the importance of health care providers providing information, education, and appropriate counselling to childbearing women is highlighted as these conversations may influence women's perceptions of risk and help them make informed choices.

Indexed as

CannabisHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePregnant PeopleFemaleHumansPregnancyQualitative ResearchAttitudesAttitude to healthCannabisHealth knowledgePerinatalPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID32754880
PMCPMC7851303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.