ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2020
Gaze towards my choice: Noneconomic social interaction changes interpersonal trust only with positive feedback.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Cues of Being Watched Promote Risk Seeking in Fund Investment in Older Adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- The role of mindfulness on theta inter-brain synchrony during cooperation feedback processing: An EEG-based hyperscanning study.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trust is a crucial foundation of human society, dynamically changing along with interpersonal interactions. Previous research suggested that both gaze behaviors and affective states might influence our trust evaluation. Here, we created an uncertain decision-making environment to investigate how these two aspects change interpersonal trust during social interactions. Specifically, participants made a forced choice between two price-matched goods to determine which one was more expensive. After participants made a choice, the face in the center of the screen would gaze towards or away from the participants' choice, and then participants would receive timely feedback informing whether their choice was correct or not. In Experiment 1 (N = 34), we found people increased their trust ratings for gaze-followers but reduced them for gaze-unfollowers when they received positive feedback, but stayed with their initial judgments when receiving negative feedback. Experiment 2 (N = 20) and Experiment S1 (N = 20) further revealed the same change patterns on participants' trust investments in different conditions. These results suggest that gaze-following behavior can change people's trust evaluations as well as trust behaviors, while affective states induced by different feedback modulate this process in a flexible manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32754783What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.