ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2020
Contextual and Spatial Associations Between Objects Interactively Modulate Visual Processing.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disentangling objects' contextual associations from perceptual and conceptual attributes using time-resolved neural decoding.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- The development of object representations in children.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- The impact of spatial skills on problem-solving parsimony and solution quality in middle childhood.The British journal of developmental psychology · 2025Article
- Visual periodicity reveals distinct attentional signatures for face and non-face categories.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Predictive processing of scenes and objects.Nature reviews psychology · 2024Article
- The effects of distractors on brightness perception based on a spiking network.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Concurrent contextual and time-distant mnemonic information co-exist as feedback in the human visual cortex.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Hierarchical organization of objects in scenes is reflected in mental representations of objects.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Statistical learning of distractor co-occurrences facilitates visual search.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Encoding specificity instead of online integration of real-world spatial regularities for objects in working memory.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- The transverse occipital sulcus and intraparietal sulcus show neural selectivity to object-scene size relationships.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Review
- Word Detection in Individual Subjects Is Difficult to Probe With Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Much of what we know about object recognition arises from the study of isolated objects. In the real world, however, we commonly encounter groups of contextually associated objects (e.g., teacup and saucer), often in stereotypical spatial configurations (e.g., teacup above saucer). Here we used electroencephalography to test whether identity-based associations between objects (e.g., teacup-saucer vs. teacup-stapler) are encoded jointly with their typical relative positioning (e.g., teacup above saucer vs. below saucer). Observers viewed a 2.5-Hz image stream of contextually associated object pairs intermixed with nonassociated pairs as every fourth image. The differential response to nonassociated pairs (measurable at 0.625 Hz in 28/37 participants) served as an index of contextual integration, reflecting the association of object identities in each pair. Over right occipitotemporal sites, this signal was larger for typically positioned object streams, indicating that spatial configuration facilitated the extraction of the objects' contextual association. This high-level influence of spatial configuration on object identity integration arose ~ 320 ms post-stimulus onset, with lower-level perceptual grouping (shared with inverted displays) present at ~ 130 ms. These results demonstrate that contextual and spatial associations between objects interactively influence object processing. We interpret these findings as reflecting the high-level perceptual grouping of objects that frequently co-occur in highly stereotyped relative positions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.