ArticleSurgery open science2020
Is preoperative anemia a significant risk factor for splenectomy patients? A NSQIP analysis.
Article in Surgery open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative anaemia in distal pancreatectomy: a propensity-score matched analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Article
- Risk factors for extended hospital stay after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A national versus institutional comparison using propensity score matching.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrior literature has examined the association between preoperative anemia and complications across surgical settings; however, evidence is lacking for splenectomy patients. We investigated the association between preoperative hematocrit and 30-day postoperative outcomes in this population using a national database.
methodsPatients who underwent splenectomy (2012-2017) were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Analyses were performed for the overall cohort and elective versus emergent subsets, adjusting for transfusion among other covariates.
resultsOur sample included 5,580 patients. As hematocrit decreased, complication rates increased incrementally in both the univariate and multivariate analyses. Adjusted odds ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) for moderate anemia (26% ≤ hematocrit < 30%) as compared to no anemia (hematocrit ≥ 38%) were readmission = 1.5 (1.1-1.8), sepsis = 2.2 (1.6-3.0), and composite outcome = 1.8 (1.0-3.2). Parameter estimates (standard error, P value) for the moderate versus no anemia group were length of stay = 3.0 (0.5, P < .001) and days to discharge = 1.2 (0.3; P < .001).
conclusionOur results demonstrate a dose-response relationship between increasing degree of anemia and odds of various postoperative adverse outcomes after adjusting for several potential confounders. The subset analysis further suggests that elective splenectomy cases are more likely to have poor outcomes when in the presence of anemia or when transfusions are performed as compared to emergent cases. This suggests that the harm associated with transfusion may offset the benefit of optimizing anemia in an elective splenectomy case.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.